Talk:Human thermoregulation

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

On 8 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Thermoregulation in humans to Human thermoregulation. The result of the discussion was moved.

Proposed merge with Cold and heat adaptations in humans

There's worthwhile content at the newer article, but it's an

content fork ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

I agree with you GiggsIsLegend (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The two articles cover distinct topics. The newer article (page opened September 2016) is

Thermoregulation in humans (December 2015), is less well linked and more focussed on acute, physiological adaptions. Given that both topics are important, can I suggest that they remain separate, linked through a 'main' template in the section Cold and heat adaptations in humans#Physiological adaptations. Klbrain (talk) 13:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Support, thermoregulation is a more general name, but semantically identical with "cold and heat adaption". This discussion is about the topic, citations can be updated, but I don't see a rational reason for the differentiation of those terms. –Tobias (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an

technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 12:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:CONCISE, in line with human brain, human body, human behavior, and other articles about human anatomy and characteristics, more commonly used term. –Tobias (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 02:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment - No comment on the overall move, but worth mentioning that "X in humans" isn't entirely uncommon - see regeneration in humans, injury in humans, sex differences in humans for examples. Goes without saying that this format being in wide use doesn't necessarily mean it's correct though. Couruu (talk) 08:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, but sex differences in humans doesn't seem to be an appropriate title compared to "human sex differences" as well. As for the injuries and regeneration, it is useful the way it is since it is more referred to as a mechanism which is attributed to a certain species rather than an attributive word denoting a mechanism of a species, you know? –Tobias (talk) 09:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Physiology has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 02:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.