Talk:Aparna Sen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Fair use rationale for Image:Akash6f.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 04:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

File:Aparna Sen.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Aparna Sen.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is
    non-free
    then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
    fair use rationale
    then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Aparna Sen.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --

talk) 13:25, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aparna Sen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly libellous content

The Other Achievements section contains some statements that are potentially libellous and not supported by adequate sources. Do other editors think that there are grounds for retaining them? Amuk (talk) 20:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Since there has been no response in the last two months, I will begin to remove the potentially libellous material. Amuk (talk) 03:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aparna Sen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BLP sources tag

Since the potentially libellous content has been removed and four new sources added, isn't it time to remove the BLP sources tag? Amuk (talk) 20:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no response from other editors. I will wait for a week and then remove the tag. Amuk (talk) 20:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am removing the tag. Amuk (talk) 05:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]