Should this title really be included on this template? Stevens' sole contribution to the film was to complete direction on one segment started by John Huston, who had to leave before finishing due to prior commitments. Stevens didn't even receive screen billing at the time the film was released. Can it be considered a "George Stevens film"? In my opinion, no. MovieMadness (talk) 20:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
