User talk:Julia W/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Pong

Thanks for the note, I'll try to be there more regularly. And well done for resurrecting some of the stronger points from earlier discussions of FPC page rearrangements. Btw, WP is very slow for me today - has that been a problem generally? With seasonal greetings, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 10:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Could you perhaps delete the now-empty page at File:American buffalo proof vertical edit.jpg for me? It had an FP star that's been moved to the currently used File:2006 American Buffalo Proof Obverse.jpg and File:2006 American Buffalo Proof Reverse.jpg. I also wondered if you'd be interested in maybe picking one or two of the marine snail articles that Llez has Commons FPs for, and expand them enough that they could be nominated at FPC on en. These are the articles: Bolinus cornutus, Cassis cornuta, Siratus alabaster, Lambis millepeda. Also wondering what your plans are with Nhobgood images - various people seem to be picking them off one or two at a time, but there's no coherent effort as yet. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 17:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply and notification. Article looks good - well-sourced! I'm not sure how much time I can give to thinking about fruits and the coordination of Nhobgood noms, but I'll try to keep it in mind and get back to you at some point. Happy New Year. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 12:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC) PS: Fruit nom just in.


DYK

Hi Maedin, starting yesterday, if you already have 5 DYK credits then you need to review a hook in the T:TDYK queue before your's can be promoted to the main page. I've reviewed yours but can you review one when you have the time and not this underneath you nomination once it is confirmed? By the way, if you get details from google books (as I assume the tyrian purple fact was) then this tool is very useful at making references and saving you time. SmartSE (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Smartse, thanks for the note, I hadn't been aware of the new requirement until I nominated Bolinus cornutus today. I left a note there now to say I've reviewed a nomination.
Thanks also for the link to the google books tool, that will be useful!
talk
00:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
No worries, apologies for my earlier apostrophe crime (your's). SmartSE (talk) 11:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Maasai woman with stretched ears.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 15:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Will you close this nomination, please? Thanks. Makeemlighter (talk) 21:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Sure! Sorry, I haven't been paying much attention to closures recently, might have taken me ages to notice it, so thanks for the ping, :)
talk
21:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. We've been covered for the closures lately, but Juju and I both voted on this one - quite a coincidence considering how infrequently I vote! Thanks again, and Happy New Year. Makeemlighter (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
FYI, I created a delist archive for 2011 and moved that nomination there. Makeemlighter (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have realised it needed a new archive. Oops, Thank you for fixing it for me.
talk
07:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

William Buelow Gould

Hi Maedin.

Thanks for the review - it was starting to get a bit old there. :) Yeah, am fine with the new hook. I think DYK is really just a way to get some increased early traffic to an article and maybe a few more links in, so whatever reads most easily is good (it possibly should have an 'in' or 'of' in the "to the penal colony Van Diemen's Land" as it wasn't just one big prison colony and there were many free-settlers by then, but I think it gets the message across; it's already in the queue now, so probably too late to change it). It was my first nom there BTW.

I was going to add the picture of Gould as you suggested (had it all written out in the nom) but ended up pulling back based on the licensing. I think it's the self-portrait, but unfortunately couldn't find an actual site that listed both the pic and its name/date so thought just to be safe we better not put it on the mainpage. I have seen the self-portrait in person, but it was many years ago now and I can't remember.

BTW have just received permission from the Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office to publish some of his work on Wikipedia (I was actually hoping to get it before it went to DYK, but they've been on holidays). They're pretty high res unlike the version of the portrait I've got. Technically I think they'd be out of copyright, but it's good to have the official permission. Do you know whether that should go through an OTRS?

Cheers, --jjron (talk) 03:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Didn't think I could edit that page to change the hook myself, maybe admins only? Was thinking of doing an admin run just so as not to be limited in simple things like that. Heh, no wasn't taking it particularly personally with it lingering, thought if it gets in good, and if not, doesn't matter... Good idea, will drop Milburn a note. Thanks, --jjron (talk) 13:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Bolinus cornutus

Dravecky (talk

) 22:27, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Excellent work on Bolinus cornutus! Added to Portal:Gastropods. --Snek01 (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you!  :)
talk
07:24, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

ACC Account Suspended

Hi Maedin! I received the notification in my email that my ACC access had been suspended from lack of use. I had intended to be an active participant on the ACC team. However, I noticed that every time that I went on IRC using the link provided by

IRC client, and an IRC cloak, and connect to the IRC using the other link provided by Stwalkerster — irc://chat.freenode.net/#wikipedia-en-accounts.

Unfortunately, that was where my difficulty began: I could not figure out which freeware/shareware client to use with Microsoft Internet Explorer (MS IE). I thought I could use ChatZilla, but the more I read about it, the less I understood it to be usable in MS IE. You can see elsewhere that I’ve explored this dilemma before.

If you have any suggestion as to the right/best client for me to use with MS IE, I’d like to return to doing ACC work. Thanks! — SpikeToronto

21:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Hallo, I've unsuspended you now, so that you can use ACC as soon as you get your cloak.

Your main issue here is not whether you are using a webchat service or an IRC client. You'll notice on the login page of the webclient that Stwalkerster linked you to that there's an option called "Auth to services". Clicking this allows you to enter your cloaked username and password (once you have one), and you then join the channel cloaked, and no one can see your IP address. (I think this simplicity actually makes it easier to use than ChatZilla, which I've always found a little over-complicated, not being much of an IRC user myself, :P)

Do you already have a nick registered with the freenode network? If not, that's where you need to begin, I think, see here: [1]. It's painless.

Then you definitely need a cloak; I take it from the conversation you linked that you've already read the guidance on cloaks at Meta. Make your request here: [2]. I remember it used to take a long time for cloaks to come through, I'm not sure if this is still the case or not. The interface looks different from what I recall and it may be that it's more reliably maintained now? I guess you'll find out!

Once you have been informed that your cloak is in place, I think you should be able to "Auth to services" and enter the channel cloaked. If it doesn't work for your "first time" though (it should, but just in case), you'll have to enter the channel, IP revealed, and then type /msg nickserv identify <your password>. That will "identify" you and enact your cloak for as long as you remain in that session. Next time you log in you'll have to identify in the same way again (unless you use "Auth to services", which is obviously better).

As for IRC clients, please do not pay! I understand that mIRC was recommended to you, but there's really no need to pay for a client, there are many good free ones. I've used ChatZilla most often because I use Firefox, but I recommend Pidgin. It's open source, free, browser-independent, easy to use, and integrates with loads of different networks: Pidgin. It's simple to enter channels wearing your cloak, but then it is in the webclient, too. You can try both once you have your cloak and see which you prefer.

Hope this helps, feel free to ask more questions if you need to. No guarantee that I'll be of use, but I try!  :)

talk
22:24, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Wow! That’s amazing advice!! I will read it all again at the beginning of the week. It’s just that it’s 12:45AM here now … I love that I do not have to use an IRC client. I was wondering what the “Auth to services” box was for! I’ll go through your instructions step by step this week. It’ll be great when my IP is hidden. It seems my ISP doesn’t change them very often. I’ve had the current one well over a year and really do not want to be trackable. What might happen if people could find that I’m in Toronto?! Thanks again! — SpikeToronto 05:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
UPDATE:  I was so excited about all this information, that I decided to get going on it now. So, I registered my nick. Then I started making the cloak request, only one part would not work for me. When I send this string, /msg MemoServ send wmfgc IRC cloak request, I get the following message: MemoServ- You are not logged in..

I tried it on the following channels: wikipedia-en-accounts, wikipedia, and MemoServ. Same response each time. Any advice? Thanks! — SpikeToronto 06:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I think the problem is that you had not already identified before sending the msg to MemoServ. You need to use your nick registration info and send /msg nickserv identify <your password>. You should then see a response: You are now identified for SpikeToronto. It has to know that you're the owner of the registered nick. Once you've done that, try sending the msg to MemoServ again, and you'll probably get The memo has been successfully sent to wmfgc. Let me know if identifying first does the trick or not, :) If not, we'll have to think of something else!
talk
09:22, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Worked like a charm! I received MemoServ- The memo has been successfully sent to wmfgc. As for your postscript, I understood what you were telling me! I knew it wasn’t about the cloak yet. You were quite clear. I’ll let you know how things progress. Thanks again! — SpikeToronto 19:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
You're welcome. Glad it worked, :)
talk
19:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Still haven’t got my cloak. I know, I know. It’s too early. I’m just so excited since you unlocked the secrets of IRC cloaks for me! Guess I should be patient and do some backlogged editing on my to-do list while I wait.… Thanks and keep your
fingers crossed! — SpikeToronto
00:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Consider them crossed! You'll have your highwayman/
talk
08:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Harry Potter! — SpikeToronto 08:39, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Totally. My first choice, too, :)
talk
06:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Still don’t have cloak. Should I follow up? Or, is it still too soon to be worrying? Thanks! — SpikeToronto 21:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Have you logged into IRC to check if the cloak is active now, or are you waiting to be informed? I don't think they give notifications, so I would test it by logging in. If it's still not in place, I'd pester them by now (as I think they suggest it takes about a week for cloaks to come through).
talk
13:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Ah! I thought I would be getting a notification either on my talk page or through email. So, I will give the IRC a try. Lemme scroll up to where you told me how to do it … Btw, how far to the right do you think we can go before one of us outdents?! Thanks! — SpikeToronto 20:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Had to outdent to fit in what I am about to put on your page. Sorry I ruined the test. Anyway, I just went on to IRC and received this response:

[15:35] NickServ- You are now identified for SpikeToronto.

[15:35] == wikipedia/SpikeToronto is now your hidden host (set by services.)

[15:35] -MemoServ- You have 1 new memo.

[15:35] -MemoServ- To read them, type /msg MemoServ READ NEW

[15:35] == gateway/web/freenode/ip.xx.xxx.xx.xxx is now your hidden host (set by syn.) [Actual IP address removed]

[15:35] == wikipedia/SpikeToronto is now your hidden host (set by syn.)

The way I interpret that, I am now cloaked. Would you agree? Thanks! — SpikeToronto 20:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

P.S.  By the way, the memo referred to by MemoServ was: wmfgc has read a memo from you sent at Jan 09 18:59:56 2011, which most likely was the memo one has to send as part of the acquiring-a-cloak process. — SpikeToronto

I'm glad you outdented, because I wouldn't have given in, ;) Yes, you now have a cloak! The wikipedia/SpikeToronto is the important part. Congratulations! I'm sorry I didn't answer your message from the 18th sooner, your cloak may have been in place for a while. Enjoy your newfound invisibility,
talk
22:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Don’t worry about not getting back to me sooner. I knew you’re very busy and there was no urgency on my part. As for the outdent, I was hoping we’d have reached a point where the text was practically vertical! Alas, it was not to be … sigh. On the other hand, I now have a cloak! Harry Potter, ya ain’t so special anymore! :) — SpikeToronto 01:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Uh-oh. I happened to re-read my first response to you and just realised I said, "Once you have been informed that your cloak is in place..." No wonder you were waiting. I was pretty sure that notifications weren't given, so I have no idea why I said that. Sorry to have been misleading and careless! Clearly not a brainy Hermione,
talk
12:37, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
To be honest, I’d not remembered that you had said that. It just made sense to me that one would be informed since, otherwise, one would have to keep logging in — revealing one’s IP address — to check if one were cloaked. Anyway, it’s an interesting procedure. There’s no interaction with a named person. It’s as if I prayed to the gods atop Mount Olympus and they answered my prayers! (There’s a first time for everything, I guess …) ’Tis all done now. And it never would have happened without your patient help. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 20:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Agreed, it does make sense to be informed. However, I bet there are other methods of finding out if you're cloaked or not that don't involve revealing your IP. You don't have to log in directly to a channel where others can see you, for example. Ah, yeah, I've just tried the webchat link and if you remove the channel before logging in, it works fine and it's just you and freenode, no users around. Sorry, I should have thought of that before, :-\ Rats, that's my fault, :( I knew you could but for some reason thought it might not work on the simple webchat client and didn't even bother to check. Eeeep.
talk
07:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar
Thank you for all your help! I never could have got it done without you. Thanks again! — SpikeToronto 09:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
That's really sweet, thank you very much! You were fun and very friendly, it was my pleasure to be helpful, :)
talk
12:37, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
You don’t know the half of it: that’s the first barnstar that I’ve ever given out, after thousands of edits. But none have deserved it more. As for being fun and friendly, it’s easy to be with someone as helpful as you. Thanks again! — SpikeToronto 20:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Awww, shucks, :)
talk
07:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Großbottwar