Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rusty Fein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 06:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rusty Fein

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and United States of America. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Subject meets the
WP:SIGCOV such as [[1]] and [[2]]. Let'srun (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions. Owen× ☎ 12:32, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Moderate success at lower levels but does not meet
WP:GNG guidelines. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I don't get you. Which part of
WP:GNG are you saying? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep - The first source provided above is quite good, especially if you go to C5, where it focuses much more on him. I lean towards discounting the second source above since it mostly talks about his former partner's retirement and him contemplating the same in very few words. It is also the same publication and not independent of source #1 above. However, from the sources in the article, the Skate Today piece seems to cover him specifically in depth. Those are enough to meet GNG vice NSKATE in my view. -2pou (talk) 19:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: The article meets
WP:BASIC. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
What “major awards” has this guy won? Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The
WP:BEFORE is also important. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@Bgsu98, this mentions and collabs this and this is at least there will be existing source. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That a PROD was removed doesn't make an article non notable. I see you nominated articles simply because they doesn't meet

WP:NSKATE; this is a secondary/additional way after the article lacks valuable and verifiable sources to establish notability. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.