Charles I of Hungary

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Charles I
Székesfehérvár Basilica
Spouses
Issue
more...
HouseCapetian House of Anjou
FatherCharles Martel of Anjou
MotherClemence of Austria
ReligionCatholic Church

Charles I, also known as Charles Robert (

Robert, heir to the Kingdom of Naples
, thus disinheriting Charles.

Charles came to the Kingdom of Hungary upon the invitation of an influential Croatian lord,

nobleman, or oligarch. One of those oligarchs, Ladislaus III Kán, captured and imprisoned Otto of Bavaria in 1307. Charles was elected king in Pest
on 27 November 1308, but his rule remained nominal in most parts of his kingdom even after he was crowned with the Holy Crown on 27 August 1310.

Charles won his first decisive victory in the Battle of Rozgony (at present-day Rozhanovce in Slovakia) on 15 June 1312. After that, his troops seized most fortresses of the powerful Aba family. During the next decade, Charles restored royal power primarily with the assistance of the prelates and lesser noblemen in most regions of the kingdom. After the death of the most powerful oligarch, Matthew Csák, in 1321, Charles became the undisputed ruler of the whole kingdom, with the exception of Croatia where local noblemen were able to preserve their autonomous status. He was not able to hinder the development of Wallachia into an independent principality after his defeat in the Battle of Posada in 1330. Charles's contemporaries described his defeat in that battle as a punishment from God for his cruel revenge against the family of Felician Záh who had attempted to slaughter the royal family.

Charles rarely made perpetual land grants, instead introduced a system of "office fiefs", whereby his officials enjoyed significant revenues, but only for the time they held a royal office, which ensured their loyalty. In the second half of his reign, Charles did not hold

Casimir III of Poland. Treaties signed at the same congress also contributed to the development of new commercial routes linking Hungary with Western Europe. Charles's efforts to reunite Hungary, together with his administrative and economic reforms, established the basis for the achievements of his successor, Louis the Great
.

Early years

Childhood (1288–1300)

Charles was the only son of

Croatian and Slavonian noble families seemingly acknowledged Charles Martel's claim, but in fact their loyalty vacillated between Charles Martel and Andrew III.[10][11]

Charles Martel died in autumn 1295, and his seven-year-old son, Charles, inherited his claim to Hungary.

Robert, to his grandson, bestowed the rights of a firstborn son upon Robert on 13 February 1296.[14] Pope Boniface VIII confirmed Charles II's decision on 27 February 1296, excluding the child Charles from succeeding his grandfather in the Kingdom of Naples.[14] Dante Alighieri wrote of "the schemes and frauds that would attack"[15] Charles Martel's family in reference to Robert's alleged manoeuvres to acquire the right to inherit Naples.[16] The 14th-century historian Giovanni Villani also noted that his contemporaries were of the opinion that Robert's claim to Naples was weaker than his nephew's.[16] The jurist Baldus de Ubaldis refrained from setting out his position on the legitimacy of Robert's rule.[16]

Struggle for Hungary (1300–1308)

Illuminated Chronicle
A dozen provinces depicted in a map
The provinces ruled by the oligarchs (powerful lords) in the early 14th century

Andrew III of Hungary made his maternal uncle,

George, to Italy in early 1300 to convince Charles II of Naples to send his grandson to Hungary to claim the throne in person.[18] The king of Naples accepted the proposal and borrowed 1,300 ounces of gold from Florentine bankers to finance Charles's journey.[9][19] A Neapolitan knight of French origin, Philip Drugeth, accompanied the twelve-year-old Charles to Hungary.[20] They landed at Split in Dalmatia in August 1300.[9][21] From Split, Paul Šubić escorted him to Zagreb where Ugrin Csák swore loyalty to Charles.[22] Charles's opponent, Andrew III of Hungary, died on 14 January 1301.[23] Charles hurried to Esztergom where the Archbishop-elect, Gregory Bicskei, crowned him with a provisional crown before 13 May.[24][25] However, most Hungarians considered Charles's coronation unlawful because customary law required that it should have been performed with the Holy Crown of Hungary in Székesfehérvár.[24][22]

Charles counted his regnal years from this coronation, but Hungary had actually disintegrated into about a dozen independent provinces, each ruled by a powerful lord, or oligarch.

Archbishop of Esztergom to perform the ceremony.[25]

After Wenceslaus's coronation, Charles withdrew to Ugrin Csák's domains in the southern regions of the kingdom.

Illuminated Chronicle,[32] they feared that "the free men of the kingdom should lose their freedom by accepting a king appointed by the Church".[33] Charles laid siege to Buda, the capital of the kingdom, in September 1302, but Ivan Kőszegi relieved the siege.[25] Charles's charters show that he primarily stayed in the southern parts of the kingdom during the next years although he also visited Amadeus Aba in the fortress of Gönc.[26]

Pope Boniface who regarded Hungary as a fief of the

Pressburg (now Bratislava in Slovakia) on 24 August.[31][37] After signing an alliance, they jointly invaded Bohemia in the autumn.[31][38] Wenceslaus who had succeeded his father in Bohemia renounced his claim to Hungary in favor of Otto III, Duke of Bavaria on 9 October 1305.[39]

Otto was crowned with the Holy Crown in Székesfehérvár on 6 December 1305 by

Bishop of Veszprém, and Anthony, Bishop of Csanád.[39][40][38] He was never able to strengthen his position in Hungary, because only the Kőszegis and the Transylvanian Saxons supported him.[31] Charles seized Esztergom and many fortresses in the northern parts of Hungary (now in Slovakia) in 1306.[41][38] His partisans also occupied Buda in June 1307.[41] Ladislaus Kán, Voivode of Transylvania, seized and imprisoned Otto in Transylvania.[39][42] An assembly of Charles's partisans confirmed Charles's claim to the throne on 10 October, but three powerful lords—Matthew Csák, Ladislaus Kán, and Ivan Kőszegi—were absent from the meeting.[41][38] In 1308, Ladislaus Kán released Otto, who then left Hungary.[42] Otto never ceased styling himself King of Hungary, but he never returned to the country.[41]

Pope Clement V sent a new papal legate, Gentile Portino da Montefiore, to Hungary.[41][43] Montefiore arrived in the summer of 1308.[41] In the next few months, he persuaded the most powerful lords one by one to accept Charles's rule.[41] At the Diet, which was held in the Dominican monastery in Pest, Charles was unanimously proclaimed king on 27 November 1308.[43][44] The delegates sent by Matthew Csák and Ladislaus Kán were also present at the assembly.[44]

Reign

Wars against the oligarchs (1308–1323)

King Charles Robert as depicted in the Chronica Hungarorum
Illuminated Chronicle: in this battle, Charles defeated the sons of Amadeus Aba
on 15 June 1312

The papal legate convoked the synod of the Hungarian prelates, who declared the monarch inviolable in December 1308.[43][44] They also urged Ladislaus Kán to hand over the Holy Crown to Charles.[44] After Kán refused to do so, the legate consecrated a new crown for Charles.[43] Thomas II, Archbishop of Esztergom crowned Charles king with the new crown in the Church of Our Lady in Buda on 15 or 16 June 1309.[43][45] However, most Hungarians regarded his second coronation invalid.[41] The papal legate excommunicated Ladislaus Kán, who finally agreed to give the Holy Crown to Charles.[43] On 27 August 1310, Archbishop Thomas of Esztergom put the Holy Crown on Charles's head in Székesfehérvár; thus, Charles's third coronation was performed in full accordance with customary law.[41][46][45] However, his rule remained nominal in most parts of his kingdom.[41]

Matthew Csák laid siege Buda in June 1311, and Ladislaus Kán declined to assist the king.

Nagyszombat (now Trnava in Slovakia) in 1313 and Visegrád in 1315, but was unable to win a decisive victory.[49]

Charles transferred his residence from Buda to Temesvár in early 1315.[55][49] Ladislaus Kán died in 1315, but his sons did not yield to Charles.[56][47] Charles launched a campaign against the Kőszegis in Transdanubia and Slavonia in the first half of 1316.[57][58] Local noblemen joined the royal troops, which contributed to the quick collapse of the Kőszegis' rule in southern parts of their domains.[57] Meanwhile, James Borsa made an alliance against Charles with Ladislaus Kán's sons and other lords, including Mojs Ákos and Peter, son of Petenye.[47] They offered the crown to Andrew of Galicia.[47][57] Charles's troops, which were under the command of a former supporter of the Borsas, Dózsa Debreceni, defeated the rebels' united troops at Debrecen at the end of June.[58][59] In the next two months, many fortresses of Borsa and his allies fell to the royal troops in Bihar, Szolnok, Borsod and Kolozs counties.[58] No primary source has made reference to Charles's bravery or heroic acts, suggesting that he rarely fought in person in the battles and sieges.[55] However, he had excellent strategic skills: it was always Charles who appointed the fortresses to be besieged.[55]

Nevicke Castle (present-day Uzhhorod and Nevytsky Castle in Ukraine) from them.[62] After that, Charles invaded Matthew Csák's domains and captured Komárom (now Komárno in Slovakia) on 3 November 1317.[62] After his uncle, King Robert of Naples, granted the Principality of Salerno and the domain of Monte Sant'Angelo to his brother (Charles's younger uncle), John, Charles protested and laid claim to those domains, previously held by his father.[63][64]

After Charles neglected to reclaim Church property that Matthew Csák had seized by force, the prelates of the realm made an alliance in early 1318 against all who would jeopardize their interests.[65] Upon their demand, Charles held a Diet in summer, but refused to confirm the Golden Bull of 1222.[66][58] Before the end of the year, the prelates made a complaint against Charles because he had taken possession of Church property.[58] In 1319, Charles fell so seriously ill that the pope authorized Charles's confessor to absolve him from his all sins before he died, but Charles recovered.[67] In the same year, Dózsa Debreceni, whom Charles had made voivode of Transylvania, launched successful expeditions against Ladislaus Kán's sons and their allies, and Charles's future Judge royal, Alexander Köcski, seized the Kőszegis' six fortresses.[68] In summer, Charles launched an expedition against Stefan Uroš II Milutin, during which he retook Belgrade and restored the Banate of Macsó.[61] The last Diet during Charles's reign was held in 1320; following that, he failed to convoke the yearly public judicial sessions, contravening the provisions of the Golden Bull.[69]

Matthew Csák died on 18 March 1321.

Trencsén (now Trenčín in Slovakia), which fell on 8 August.[71][72] About three months later, Charles's new voivode of Transylvania, Thomas Szécsényi, seized Csicsó (present-day Ciceu-Corabia in Romania), the last fortress of Ladislaus Kán's sons.[71][47]

In January 1322, two Dalmatian towns, Šibenik and Trogir, rebelled against Mladen II Šubić, who was a son of Charles's one-time leading partisan, Paul Šubić.[73] The two towns also accepted the suzerainty of the Republic of Venice although Charles had urged Venice not to intervene in the conflict between his subjects.[71] Many Croatian lords (including his own brother, Paul II Šubić) also turned against Mladen, and their coalition defeated him at Klis.[74] In September, Charles marched to Croatia where all the Croatian lords who were opposed to Mladen Šubić yielded to him in Knin.[74] Mladen Šubić also visited Charles, but the king had the powerful lord imprisoned.[74]

Consolidation and reforms (1323–1330)

Coats of Arms of Charles I of Anjou, King of Hungary

As one of his charters concluded, Charles had taken "full possession" of his kingdom by 1323.

Pressburg (now Bratislava in Slovakia), which they had controlled for decades, in exchange for the support they had received from Charles against Louis IV, Holy Roman Emperor, in 1322.[77]

Royal power was only nominally restored in the lands between the

Babonići and the Kőszegis rose up in open rebellion in 1327, but Ban Mikcs and Alexander Köcski defeated them.[81] In retaliation, at least eight fortresses of the rebellious lords were confiscated in Slavonia and Transdanubia.[82]

Through his victory over the oligarchs, Charles acquired about 60% of the Hungarian castles, along with the estates belonging to them.

honors), whereby his officials were entitled to enjoy all revenues accrued from their offices, but only for the time they held those offices.[86][87] That system assured the preponderance of royal power, enabling Charles to rule "with the plenitude of power", as he emphasized in one of his charters of 1335.[86][69] He even ignored customary law: for instance, "promoting a daughter to a son", which entitled her to inherit her father's estates instead of her male cousins.[88] Charles also took control of the administration of the Church in Hungary.[89] He appointed the Hungarian prelates at will, without allowing the cathedral chapters to elect them.[89]

florin made popular by the Republic of Florence
in the 13th century

He promoted the spread of

order of knighthood by establishing the Order of Saint George in 1326.[92][93] He was the first Hungarian king to grant helmet crests to his faithful followers to distinguish them from others "by means of an insignium of their own", as he emphasized in one of his charters.[90][94]

Charles reorganized and improved the administration of royal revenues.

minting of gold coins began under Charles's auspices in the lands north of the Alps in Europe.[97] His florins, which were modelled on the gold coins of Florence, were first issued in 1326.[97][99]

Illuminated Chronicle

Internal peace and increasing royal revenues strengthened the international position of Hungary in the 1320s.

Muraköz (now Međimurje in Croatia).[77][103] The following year, Serbian troops laid siege to Belgrade, but Charles relieved the fortress.[81]

Alliance with his father-in-law,

Elisabeth of Poland, according to an Italian writer.[105][106][107] On 17 April 1330, the young lady's father, Felician Záh, stormed into the dining room of the royal palace at Visegrád with a sword in his hand and attacked the royal family.[108] Záh wounded both Charles and the queen on their right hand and attempted to kill their two sons, Louis and Andrew, before the royal guards killed him.[109] Charles's revenge was brutal: with the exception of Clara, Felician Záh's children were tortured to death; Clara's lips and all eight fingers were cut before she was dragged by a horse through the streets of many towns; all of Felician's other relatives within the third degree of kinship (including his sons-in-law and sisters) were executed, and those within the seventh degree were condemned to perpetual serfdom.[110][107]

Active foreign policy (1330–1339)

Battle of Posada: Wallachian (Romanian) warriors ambushed and defeated the Hungarian mounted knights in a narrow valley.

In September 1330, Charles launched a military expedition against Basarab I of Wallachia who had attempted to get rid of his suzerainty.[111][81] After seizing the fortress of Severin (present-day Drobeta-Turnu Severin in Romania), he refused to make peace with Basarab and marched towards Curtea de Argeș, which was Basarab's seat.[111] The Wallachians applied scorched earth tactics, compelling Charles to make a truce with Basarab and withdraw his troops from Wallachia.[111] While the royal troops were marching through a narrow pass across the Southern Carpathians on 9 November, the Wallachians ambushed them.[112] During the next four days, the royal army was decimated; Charles could only escape from the battlefield after changing his clothes with one of his knights, Desiderius Hédervári, who sacrificed his life to enable the king's escape.[112][77] Charles did not attempt a new invasion of Wallachia, which subsequently developed into an independent principality.[112][77]

In September 1331, Charles made an alliance with Otto the Merry, Duke of Austria, against Bohemia.

Galambóc (now Golubac in Serbia).[81]

In summer 1335, the delegates of John of Bohemia and the new King of Poland,

Casimir III, entered into negotiations in Trencsén to put an end to the conflicts between the two countries.[120] With Charles's mediation, a compromise was reached on 24 August: John of Bohemia renounced his claim to Poland and Casimir of Poland acknowledged John of Bohemia's suzerainty in Silesia.[120][121] On 3 September, Charles signed an alliance with John of Bohemia in Visegrád, which was primarily formed against the Dukes of Austria.[122] Upon Charles's invitation, John of Bohemia and Casimir of Poland met in Visegrád in November.[121] During the Congress of Visegrád, the two rulers confirmed the compromise that their delegates had worked out in Trencsén.[123] Casimir III also promised to pay 400,000 groschen to John of Bohemia, but a part of this indemnification (120,000 groschen) was finally paid off by Charles instead of his brother-in-law.[123] The three rulers agreed upon a mutual defence union against the Habsburgs, and a new commercial route was set up to enable merchants travelling between Hungary and the Holy Roman Empire to bypass Vienna.[121]

Romantic painting Charles' army wear hussar clothes of the 17th century, by József Molnár

The Babonići and the Kőszegis made an alliance with the Dukes of Austria in January 1336.[101][124] John of Bohemia, who claimed Carinthia from the Habsburgs, invaded Austria in February.[124][125] Casimir III of Poland came to Austria to assist him in late June.[125] Charles soon joined them at Marchegg.[125] The dukes sought reconciliation and signed a peace treaty with John of Bohemia in July.[124] Charles signed a truce with them on 13 December, and launched a new expedition against Austria early the next year.[126] He forced the Babonići and the Kőszegis to yield, and the latter were also compelled to hand over to him their fortresses along the frontier in exchange for faraway castles.[101][127] Charles's peace treaty with Albert and Otto of Austria, which was signed on 11 September 1337, forbade both the dukes and Charles to give shelter to the other party's rebellious subjects.[127]

Charles continued the reform of coinage in the late 1330s.

silver bars.[98]

John of Bohemia's heir,

Margrave of Moravia, visited Charles in Visegrád in early 1338.[129] The margrave acknowledged the right of Charles's son, Louis, to inherit Poland if Casimir III died without a son in exchange for Charles's promise to persuade Casimir III not to invade Silesia.[130] Two leading Polish lords, Zbigniew, chancellor of Cracow, and Spycimir Leliwita, also supported this plan and persuaded Casimir III, who lost his first wife on 26 May 1339, to start negotiations with Charles.[130] In July, Casimir came to Hungary and designated his sister (Charles's wife), Elizabeth, and her sons as his heirs.[131][132] On his sons' behalf, Charles promised that they would make every effort to reconquer all lands that Poland had lost and that they would refrain from employing foreigners in Poland.[131][132]

Bač Fortress, founded by Charles I

Last years (1339–1342)

Charles obliged the Kőszegis to renounce their last fortresses along the western borders of the kingdom in 1339 or 1340.

Stephen Uroš IV Dušan of Serbia, invaded Sirmium and captured Belgrade.[81][134]

Charles was ailing during the last years of his life.

Székesfehérvár Basilica a month after his death.[108] His brother-in-law, Casimir III of Poland, and Charles, Margrave of Moravia, were present at his funeral, an indication of Charles's international prestige.[108]

Family

The

The Illuminated Chronicle stated that Charles's "first consort, Maria ... was of the Polish nation" and she was "the daughter of

King of Poland,[154] was born around 1306.[154] Their marriage took place on 6 July 1320.[154]

Most 14th-century Hungarian chroniclers write that Charles and Elisabeth of Poland had five sons.

Stephen, who were born in 1327 and 1332, respectively, also survived Charles.[159]

Although no contemporaneous or nearly contemporaneous sources made mention of any further children, Charles may have fathered two daughters, according to historians Zsuzsa Teke and Gyula Kristó.[159][160] Zsuzsa Teke writes that they were born to Mary of Bytom, but the nearly contemporaneous Peter of Zittau wrote that she had died childless.[160][158] Gyula Kristó proposes that a miniature in the Illuminated Chronicle, which depicts Elisabeth of Poland and five children, implies that she gave birth to Charles's two daughters, because Kristó identifies two of the three children standing on her right as daughters.[155] The elder of Charles's two possible daughters, Catherine, who was born in the early 1320s, was the wife of Henry II, Duke of Świdnica.[155] Their only daughter, Anne, grew up in the Hungarian royal court after her parents' death, implying that Charles and Elisabeth of Poland were her grandparents.[161] Historian Kazimierz Jasiński says that Elisabeth, the wife of Boleslaus II of Troppau, was also Charles's daughter.[158] If she was actually Charles's daughter, she must have been born in about 1330, according to Kristó.[158]

Charles also fathered an illegitimate son,

Bishop of Győr in 1336.[163]

Legacy

King Charles Robert on the 200 forint Hungarian banknote (1998–2009)
Heroes' Square in Budapest: the king holds his coat-of-arms which units the Árpád stripes with the Capetians' fleurs-de-lis

Charles often declared that his principal aim was the "restoration of the ancient good conditions" of the kingdom.[164] On his coat-of-arms, he united the "Árpád stripes" with the motifs of the coat-of-arms of his paternal family, which emphasized his kinship with the first royal house of Hungary.[164] During his reign, Charles reunited Hungary and introduced administrative and fiscal reforms.[108] He bequeathed to his son, Louis the Great, a "bulging exchequer and an effective system of taxation", according to scholar Bryan Cartledge.[134] Nevertheless, Louis the Great's achievements overshadowed Charles's reputation.[108]

The only contemporaneous record of Charles's deeds were made by a Franciscan friar who was hostile towards the monarch.[108] Instead of emphasizing Charles's achievements in the reunification of the country, the friar described in detail the negative episodes of Charles's reign.[108] In particular, the unusual cruelty that the king showed after Felician Záh's assassination attempt on the royal family contributed to the negative picture of Charles's personality.[108] The Franciscan friar attributed Charles's defeat by Basarab of Wallachia as a punishment from God for the king's revenge.[108]

References

  1. ^ a b Kristó 2002, p. 24.
  2. ^ a b Csukovits 2012a, p. 112.
  3. ^ a b Dümmerth 1982, p. 220.
  4. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 110, 383.
  5. ^ a b Cartledge 2011, p. 33.
  6. ^ a b Engel 2001, p. 110.
  7. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 98, 110.
  8. ^ Bartl et al. 2002, p. 34.
  9. ^ a b c Kristó 2002, p. 25.
  10. ^ Magaš 2007, p. 59.
  11. ^ Fine 1994, p. 207.
  12. ^ a b Kelly 2003, p. 8.
  13. ^ Dümmerth 1982, pp. 222–223.
  14. ^ a b Dümmerth 1982, p. 224.
  15. ^ The Divine Comedy, Dante Alighieri (Paradise, 9.3.), p. 667.
  16. ^ a b c Kelly 2003, p. 276.
  17. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, pp. 188–189.
  18. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 208.
  19. ^ Dümmerth 1982, p. 228.
  20. ^ Engel 2001, p. 144.
  21. ^ Engel 2001, p. 111.
  22. ^ a b Kristó 2002, pp. 25–26.
  23. ^ Dümmerth 1982, p. 229.
  24. ^ a b Engel 2001, p. 128.
  25. ^ a b c Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 188.
  26. ^ a b Kristó 2002, p. 26.
  27. ^ Engel 2001, p. 124.
  28. ^ Kontler 1999, p. 84.
  29. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 125–126.
  30. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 128–129.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g Engel 2001, p. 129.
  32. ^ Zsoldos 2013, p. 212.
  33. ^ The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle: (ch. 188.133), p. 143.
  34. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 189.
  35. ^ Dümmerth 1982, pp. 232–234.
  36. ^ Dümmerth 1982, p. 233.
  37. ^ Kristó 2002, p. 27.
  38. ^ a b c d Kristó 2002, p. 28.
  39. ^ a b c Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 190.
  40. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 129–130.
  41. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Engel 2001, p. 130.
  42. ^ a b Pop 2005, p. 251.
  43. ^ a b c d e f Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 191.
  44. ^ a b c d Kristó 2002, p. 29.
  45. ^ a b c Bartl et al. 2002, p. 37.
  46. ^ a b Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 192.
  47. ^ a b c d e Pop 2005, p. 252.
  48. ^ Kristó 2002, p. 32.
  49. ^ a b c d Engel 2001, p. 131.
  50. ^ Zsoldos 2013, p. 222.
  51. ^ a b Zsoldos 2013, p. 221.
  52. ^ Zsoldos 2013, p. 229.
  53. ^ Zsoldos 2013, p. 236.
  54. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 193.
  55. ^ a b c Kristó 2002, p. 35.
  56. ^ Kontler 1999, p. 88.
  57. ^ a b c d e f Engel 2001, p. 132.
  58. ^ a b c d e f g Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 194.
  59. ^ Zsoldos 2013, p. 235.
  60. ^ Fine 1994, p. 260.
  61. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 261.
  62. ^ a b Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 195.
  63. ^ Kristó 2002, p. 41.
  64. ^ Dümmerth 1982, p. 353.
  65. ^ Engel 2001, p. 142.
  66. ^ Engel 2001, p. 141.
  67. ^ Kristó 2002, p. 36.
  68. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 196.
  69. ^ a b Engel 2001, p. 140.
  70. ^ a b Bartl et al. 2002, p. 38.
  71. ^ a b c d Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 197.
  72. ^ a b Engel 2001, p. 133.
  73. ^ Fine 1994, pp. 210–211.
  74. ^ a b c Fine 1994, p. 212.
  75. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 144, 391.
  76. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 198.
  77. ^ a b c d e Engel 2001, p. 136.
  78. ^ a b Sălăgean 2005, p. 149.
  79. ^ a b c d Fine 1994, p. 213.
  80. ^ a b Engel 2001, p. 145.
  81. ^ a b c d e f Engel 2001, p. 135.
  82. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 199.
  83. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 149–150.
  84. ^ a b c Engel 2001, p. 150.
  85. ^ Engel 2001, p. 149.
  86. ^ a b Kontler 1999, p. 89.
  87. ^ a b Cartledge 2011, p. 34.
  88. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 140, 178.
  89. ^ a b c Engel 2001, p. 143.
  90. ^ a b c Boulton 2000, p. 29.
  91. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 146–147.
  92. ^ Boulton 2000, p. 27.
  93. ^ Cartledge 2011, p. 35.
  94. ^ Engel 2001, p. 147.
  95. ^ a b Kontler 1999, p. 90.
  96. ^ Engel 2001, p. 154.
  97. ^ a b c Engel 2001, p. 156.
  98. ^ a b c d Engel 2001, p. 155.
  99. ^ Kontler 1999, p. 91.
  100. ^ Kontler 1999, p. 92.
  101. ^ a b c Engel 2001, p. 134.
  102. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 200.
  103. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 201.
  104. ^ Knoll 1972, pp. 51, 54.
  105. ^ Knoll 1972, p. 54.
  106. ^ Dümmerth 1982, p. 341.
  107. ^ a b Engel 2001, p. 139.
  108. ^ a b c d e f g h i Engel 2001, p. 138.
  109. ^ Kristó 2002, p. 40.
  110. ^ Kristó 2002, pp. 40–41.
  111. ^ a b c Sălăgean 2005, p. 194.
  112. ^ a b c Sălăgean 2005, p. 195.
  113. ^ a b Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 202.
  114. ^ Knoll 1972, p. 58.
  115. ^ Knoll 1972, p. 61.
  116. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, pp. 202–203.
  117. ^ a b Dümmerth 1982, p. 352.
  118. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 137–138.
  119. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 203.
  120. ^ a b Knoll 1972, p. 73.
  121. ^ a b c Engel 2001, p. 137.
  122. ^ Knoll 1972, pp. 74–75.
  123. ^ a b Knoll 1972, p. 75.
  124. ^ a b c Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 204.
  125. ^ a b c Knoll 1972, p. 86.
  126. ^ Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, pp. 204–205.
  127. ^ a b Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 205.
  128. ^ Kontler 1999, pp. 91–92.
  129. ^ Knoll 1972, p. 95.
  130. ^ a b Knoll 1972, pp. 95–96.
  131. ^ a b Knoll 1972, p. 96.
  132. ^ a b Solymosi & Körmendi 1981, p. 206.
  133. ^ Engel 2001, pp. 145, 150.
  134. ^ a b Cartledge 2011, p. 36.
  135. ^ Csukovits 2012a, p. 115.
  136. ^ a b c Kristó 2002, p. 43.
  137. ^ Teke 1994, p. 48.
  138. ^ Dümmerth 1982, pp. 62–63, Appendix.
  139. ^ Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 271, Appendix 5.
  140. ^ Franzl 2002, pp. 279–280.
  141. ^ a b Kristó 2005, p. 15.
  142. ^ a b Sroka 1992, p. 261.
  143. ^ Kristó 2005, p. 16.
  144. ^ Kristó 2005, p. 17.
  145. ^ Kristó 2005, pp. 17–18.
  146. ^ Csukovits 2012a, p. 114.
  147. ^ Sroka 1992, p. 262.
  148. ^ Sroka 1992, p. 263.
  149. ^ The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle: (ch. 197.139), p. 145.
  150. ^ a b Sroka 1992, p. 265.
  151. ^ Kristó 2005, p. 19.
  152. ^ a b Kristó 2005, pp. 19–20.
  153. ^ a b Kristó 2005, p. 22.
  154. ^ a b c Knoll 1972, p. 42.
  155. ^ a b c Kristó 2005, pp. 25–26.
  156. ^ Kristó 2005, p. 23.
  157. ^ Kristó 2005, pp. 23–24.
  158. ^ a b c d Kristó 2005, p. 26.
  159. ^ a b c d Kristó 2005, p. 27.
  160. ^ a b Teke 1994, p. 49.
  161. ^ Kristó 2005, p. 25.
  162. ^ a b Szovák 1994, p. 316.
  163. ^ Szovák 1994, p. 317.
  164. ^ a b Kontler 1999, pp. 88–89.

Sources

Primary sources

  • The Divine Comedy: The Inferno, the Purgatorio, and the Paradiso – Dante Alighieri (Translated by John Ciardi) (2003). Penguin Books. .
  • The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle: Chronica de Gestis Hungarorum (Edited by Dezső Dercsényi) (1970). Corvina, Taplinger Publishing. .

Secondary sources

Further reading

External links

Charles I of Hungary
Cadet branch of the Capetian dynasty
Born: 1288 Died: 16 July 1342
Regnal titles
Preceded by
Croatia
1301 or 1308–1342
with Wenceslaus (1301–1305)
Otto
(1305–1307) (as contenders)
Succeeded by