Talk:Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip (2023–present)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Middle East / Post-Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Middle Eastern military history task force
Taskforce icon
Post-Cold War task force
WikiProject iconPalestine
WikiProject icon
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 May 2024

Please update the death totals for women and children for this article.

Original: More than 31,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since the start of the Israeli operation,[51] including more than 13,000 children and 9,000 women.[52] with another 7,000 people missing and presumed dead under the rubble of destroyed buildings.[53][54]

New: More than 35,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since the start of the Israeli operation,[1] including more than 7,800 children and 4,900 women, with another 10,000 people missing and presumed dead under the rubble of destroyed buildings.[2]


Additional context:

The original information is incorrect. The UN changed its reporting to source these numbers to Gaza Ministry of Health statistics instead of the Gaza Government Media Office's (GMO's) numbers between May 6 and May 8. Because the UN is ultimately the source of the original numbers and UNICEF is mis-citing the original stats, they should be changed. UNICEF cites the numbers as from Gaza Ministry of Health, but according to BBC (and other sources), those numbers are from GMO, not Ministry of Health: Bottom of pg 2, [3]

It may be appropriate to add a section to Misinformation regarding this change, since this inherently reflects the UN's perception that the GMO numbers dramatically overstated the percentage of women and children killed since the beginning of the conflict. That is the reason for time sensitivity around this change.

Because the numbers are closer to, but below round numbers, it is potentially easier to understand as, "including close to 8,000 children and 5,000 women." Qmarkp (talk) 21:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Qmarkp[reply]

References

 Done P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 May 2024 (2)

2A00:23C8:180B:9F00:8439:9B86:7821:5F83 (talk) 23:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Amount of Hamas fighters estimate is 20,000-25,000 fighters. US says 30%-35% killed. so ranging 7,000-8,750 kia[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
"change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Data for Casualty Information

Apologies if formatting is made incorrectly. I believe it is essential that all casualty information coming from the Gaza ministry of health includes the disclaimer that the ministry is Hamas-run, and casualties include Hamas militants. Additionally, many comments related to most casualties being women and children is no longer corroborated by the UN, and this should just say 'many of the casualties are woman and children'. These changes are necessary to ensure Wikipedia maintains its political neutrality. Public Transit User (talk) 00:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This is subject of a discussion at the main article. Selfstudier (talk) 09:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 May 2024

Under the "May 15" subsection of the "Attack on Rafah" section of the article, I recommend changing "A IDF tank fired into a building housing them." to "An IDF tank fired into a building housing them." to fix grammar. Anonymous Libertarian (talk) 08:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Donekashmīrī TALK 14:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request - misinformation - impersonations - nurse video

Please change nothing at the end of the second paragraph in impersonations section of the misinformation section of the article to: "The video was originally posted on the israeli government foreign ministry's Arabic twitter account and it was boosted by Edward Haïm Cohen Halala, who has reported ties to the israeli government, who has a popular social media presence with an Arabic following." using the three sources, daily beast for the foreign ministrys account being the source, newsweek for Edy Cohen boosting it and misbar for Edy Cohen having ties to the israeli government. https://www.thedailybeast.com/israels-comically-bad-disinfo-proves-theyre-losing-pr-war https://www.newsweek.com/israeli-influencer-denies-playing-gaza-nurse-viral-video-1844715 https://misbar.com/en/editorial/2023/08/18/how-does-edy-cohen-stir-up-controversy-and-mislead-the-arab-public-opinion Fanccr (talk) 23:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done See corresponding excerpted page. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Please remember to tag redirects that you create per

WP:REDCAT
.

voorts (talk/contributions) 05:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 May 2024

– Just like we don't have a date on

ping on reply) 18:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 07:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

My point is while your argument is based on

WP:PT1
, which is whether this title is "the topic sought when a reader searches for that term." While "Invasion of Gaza Strip" to describe the 1967 war is technically correct, RS don't use that term that way. At best RS might use "Israeli invasion of Gaza and Sinai", but more likely they would use the word "Front" as opposed to "Invasion", and most simply use "1967 war" or "Six day war". Consider other recent examples:

Caption text
Term Target that a user is likely looking for (PT1) Target that technically fits the definition and is more historically significant (PT2) Explanation for PT2
"
Invasion of Cyprus
", "Turkish invasion of Cyprus"
Turkish Invasion of Cyprus
Ottoman–Venetian War (1570–1573) The 1570 conquest by Turks took the entire island (not just the north) and endured for several centuries.
"Russian invasion of Ukraine" Russian invasion of Ukraine Russo-Polish War (1654–1667) the 17th century one actually brought Kyiv under Russian control (which didn't happen in 2022) and endured for centuries
"
Invasion of Kuwait
"
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait Battle of Chains (633) The 633 Arab-Islamic invasion resulted it in becoming predominantly Arab and Islamic. By contrast the 1991 invasion was defeated quickly.

In each of these cases, PT1 dominates mainly because few would use the given term to describe the more historically significant PT2 target.

ping on reply) 16:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

SINWAR STRATEGY

'In one message to Hamas leaders in Doha, Sinwar cited civilian losses in national-liberation conflicts in places such as Algeria, where hundreds of thousands of people died fighting for independence from France, saying, “these are necessary sacrifices.”'

'In an April 11 letter to Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh after three of Haniyeh’s adult sons were killed by an Israeli airstrike, Sinwar wrote that their deaths and those of other Palestinians would “infuse life into the veins of this nation, prompting it to rise to its glory and honor.”'

'We make the headlines only with blood,” Sinwar said in the interview at the time with an Italian journalist. “No blood, no news.”'

"Sinwar in a message urged his comrades in Hamas’s political leadership outside Gaza not to make concessions and instead to push for a permanent end to the war. High civilian casualties would create worldwide pressure on Israel, Sinwar said. The group’s armed wing was ready for the onslaught, Sinwar’s messages said. "

"Even without a lasting truce, Sinwar believes Netanyahu has few options other than occupying Gaza and getting bogged down fighting a Hamas-led insurgency for months or years."

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/gaza-chiefs-brutal-calculation-civilian-bloodshed-will-help-hamas-626720e7?mod=hp_lead_pos1