The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and
making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
make edit requests
related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
@
Wikipedia coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Any opposition? We can decide on the best single page title, but I don't think we need two separate articles at this time. ---Another Believer(Talk) 14:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Support - no need for a separate article (t · c) buidhe 15:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Buidhe Thanks for weighing in. I've proposed a more specific suggestion below, if you're interested in commenting further. ---Another Believer(Talk) 16:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. What you're suggesting is a very general topic, but I mean the 2023 war specifically, as we have another example of an article about a specific event, which is Wikipedia and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. That's why there's a need for a specific article. --Freedom's Falcon (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@
Wikipedia coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, then moving the page to "Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict". Would this work for you? Also, using "2023 Israel-Palestine war" will be outdated in a few days. ---Another Believer(Talk) 15:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
@Another Believer: Your proposal sounds good to me now. I agree with merging the articles and renaming the page. --Freedom's Falcon (talk) 07:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done Since the two page authors are in agreement, and there's general support from others, I have been bold and merged and moved to Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. I've included a merge template on the talk page for attribution, but please let me know if anything else is needed here. Thanks! ---Another Believer(Talk) 07:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support: As others have stated, there is no reason to have two articles, especially since both are fairly short. If either or both of the articles were substantial, I may have a different opinion, but there's no issue of undue weight here. Further, Freedom Falcon's point about specificity regarding the 2023 conflict does not quite apply here given that the
Wikipedia coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict article solely discusses the current conflict. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Support merge There's no need to have two separate articles; neither of them are big and they're not independently notable. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 16:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Is currently not very well done. The Wales and Harrison stuff is not summaries of article content. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gråbergs Gråa Sång Earlier, I moved some of the lead content to the body, and expanded the article significantly with previously-uncited sources. Isi96 (talk) 10:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lead is still not good. As article is currently written, Wales and Harrison don't belong there. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gråbergs Gråa Sång Wasn't arguing with you there, just noting the changes I made. Isi96 (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOENG, but: to aid the reader, they should have a title and publisher in English, and possibly a relevant translated quote, there is a parameter for that. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply