Hubbard model
The Hubbard model is an
The Hubbard model states that each electron experiences competing forces: one pushes it to tunnel to neighboring atoms, while the other pushes it away from its neighbors.
The Hubbard model is a useful approximation for particles in a periodic potential at sufficiently low temperatures, where all the particles may be assumed to be in the lowest
The Hubbard model introduces short-range interactions between electrons to the tight-binding model, which only includes kinetic energy (a "hopping" term) and interactions with the atoms of the lattice (an "atomic" potential). When the interaction between electrons is strong, the behavior of the Hubbard model can be qualitatively different from a tight-binding model. For example, the Hubbard model correctly predicts the existence of Mott insulators: materials that are insulating due to the strong repulsion between electrons, even though they satisfy the usual criteria for conductors, such as having an odd number of electrons per unit cell.
History
The model was originally proposed in 1963 to describe electrons in solids.[4] Hubbard, Martin Gutzwiller and Junjiro Kanamori each independently proposed it.[2]
Since then, it has been applied to the study of high-temperature superconductivity, quantum magnetism, and charge density waves.[5]
Narrow energy band theory
The Hubbard model is based on the
The Hubbard model introduces a contact interaction between particles of opposite spin on each site of the lattice. When the Hubbard model is used to describe electron systems, these interactions are expected to be repulsive, stemming from the
Example: one dimensional hydrogen atom chain
The hydrogen atom has one electron, in the so-called s orbital, which can either be spin up () or spin down (). This orbital can be occupied by at most two electrons, one with spin up and one down (see Pauli exclusion principle).
Under
But in the case where the spacing between the hydrogen atoms is gradually increased, at some point the chain must become an insulator.
Expressed using the Hubbard model, the Hamiltonian is made up of two terms. The first term describes the kinetic energy of the system, parameterized by the hopping integral, . The second term is the on-site interaction of strength that represents the electron repulsion. Written out in second quantization notation, the Hubbard Hamiltonian then takes the form
where is the spin-density operator for spin on the -th site. The density operator is and occupation of -th site for the wavefunction is . Typically t is taken to be positive, and U may be either positive or negative, but is assumed to be positive when considering electronic systems.
Without the contribution of the second term, the Hamiltonian resolves to the tight binding formula from regular band theory.
Including the second term yields a realistic model that also predicts a transition from conductor to insulator as the ratio of interaction to hopping, , is varied. This ratio can be modified by, for example, increasing the inter-atomic spacing, which would decrease the magnitude of without affecting . In the limit where , the chain simply resolves into a set of isolated magnetic moments. If is not too large, the overlap integral provides for
More complex systems
Although Hubbard is useful in describing systems such as a 1D chain of hydrogen atoms, it is important to note that more complex systems may experience other effects that the Hubbard model does not consider. In general, insulators can be divided into Mott–Hubbard insulators and charge-transfer insulators.
A Mott–Hubbard insulator can be described as
This can be seen as analogous to the Hubbard model for hydrogen chains, where conduction between unit cells can be described by a transfer integral.
However, it is possible for the electrons to exhibit another kind of behavior:
This is known as charge transfer and results in charge-transfer insulators. Unlike Mott–Hubbard insulators electron transfer happens only within a unit cell.
Both of these effects may be present and compete in complex ionic systems.
Numerical treatment
The fact that the Hubbard model has not been solved analytically in arbitrary dimensions has led to intense research into numerical methods for these strongly correlated electron systems.[7][8] One major goal of this research is to determine the low-temperature phase diagram of this model, particularly in two-dimensions. Approximate numerical treatment of the Hubbard model on finite systems is possible via various methods.
One such method, the
The Hubbard model can be studied within dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT). This scheme maps the Hubbard Hamiltonian onto a single-site impurity model, a mapping that is formally exact only in infinite dimensions and in finite dimensions corresponds to the exact treatment of all purely local correlations only. DMFT allows one to compute the local Green's function of the Hubbard model for a given and a given temperature. Within DMFT, the evolution of the
Simulator
Stacks of heterogeneous 2-dimensional
They can be used to form
A "backwards" stacking regime allows the creation of a Chern insulator via the
See also
- Anderson impurity model
- Bloch's theorem
- Electronic band structure
- Solid-state physics
- Bose–Hubbard model
- t-J model
- Heisenberg model (quantum)
- Dynamical mean-field theory
- Stoner criterion
References
- ^
Altland, A.; Simons, B. (2006). "Interaction effects in the tight-binding system". Condensed Matter Field Theory. ISBN 978-0-521-84508-3.
- ^ a b c d e f Wood, Charlie (16 August 2022). "Physics Duo Finds Magic in Two Dimensions". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
- S2CID 118895100.
- S2CID 35439962.
- OCLC 30028928.
- ^
Essler, F. H. L.; Frahm, H.; Göhmann, F.; Klümper, A.; Korepin, V. E. (2005). The One-Dimensional Hubbard Model. ISBN 978-0-521-80262-8.
- ^ Scalapino, D. J. (2006). "Numerical Studies of the 2D Hubbard Model": cond–mat/0610710. )
- ^ LeBlanc, J. (2015). "Solutions of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model: Benchmarks and Results from a Wide Range of Numerical Algorithms". Physical Review X. 5 (4): 041041. .
Further reading
- Hubbard, J. (1963). "Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands". S2CID 35439962.
- Bach, V.; Lieb, E. H.; Solovej, J. P. (1994). "Generalized Hartree–Fock Theory and the Hubbard Model". S2CID 207143.
- Lieb, E. H. (1995). "The Hubbard Model: Some Rigorous Results and Open Problems". Xi Int. Cong. Mp, Int. Press (?). 1995: cond–mat/9311033. Bibcode:1993cond.mat.11033L.
- Gebhard, F. (1997). "Metal–Insulator Transition". The Mott Metal–Insulator Transition: Models and Methods. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics. Vol. 137. ISBN 9783540614814.
- Lieb, E. H.; Wu, F. Y. (2003). "The one-dimensional Hubbard model: A reminiscence". S2CID 44758937.
- Arovas, Daniel P.; Berg, Erez; Kivelson, Steven; Rahgu, Sri (2022). "The Hubbard Model". .
- Qin, Mingpu; Schäfer, Thomas; Andergassen, Sabine; Corboz, Philippe; Gull, Emanuel (2022). "The Hubbard Model: A Computational Perspective". S2CID 260725458.