The Hump

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The Hump
Part of the
India-China Division, XX Bomber Command
OutcomeAllied operation successful
Casualties
  • 594 aircraft lost, missing, or written off
  • 1,659 personnel killed or missing
The Hump
Hanyu Pinyin
Tuófēng Hángxiàn

The Hump was the name given by

China Burma India Theater (CBI) for basing the large number of transport aircraft that would be needed. Flying over the Himalayas was extremely dangerous and made more difficult by a lack of reliable charts, an absence of radio navigation aids, and a dearth of information about the weather.[3]

The task was initially given to the USAAF's

Air Transport Command (ATC). Because the USAAF had no previous airlift experience as a basis for planning, it assigned commanders who had been key figures in founding the ATC in 1941–1942 to build and direct the operation, which included former civilians with extensive executive experience operating civil air carriers.[4]

Originally referred to as the "India–China Ferry",

India-China Wing
(December 1942 – June 1944) and India-China Division (July 1944 – November 1945).

The operation began in April 1942, after Japanese forces blocked the

Chinese National Aviation Corporation
(CNAC). Final operations were flown in November 1945 to return personnel from China.

The India–China airlift delivered approximately 650,000 tons of materiel to China at great cost in men and aircraft during its 42-month history.[6] For its efforts and sacrifices, the India–China Wing of the ATC was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation on 29 January 1944 at the personal direction of President Franklin D. Roosevelt,[7] the first such award made to a non-combat organization.[8]

Background: the China supply dilemma

Success of the "

C-47 Skytrain-type transports were committed to an airlift.[10][b] Chinese Air Force Major General Mao Bangchu was tasked with leading the exploration of suitable air-routes over the dangerous Himalayas in 1941,[11] and CNAC pilot Xia Pu recorded the first flight from Dinjan, India, to Kunming, China, during November of that year in what was to become the route now known as "the Hump".[12]

On 25 February 1942, President Roosevelt wrote to General

lend-lease delivery to CNAC to build its capability to 25 aircraft.[13] When the newly created Tenth Air Force opened its headquarters in New Delhi under the command of Maj. Gen. Lewis H. Brereton in March 1942, it was assigned the responsibility of developing an "India-China Ferry" using both U.S. and Chinese aircraft.[14] Although he was never given command authority over aircraft or personnel, the officer responsible for the India-China Ferry was Brereton's chief of staff Brig. Gen. Earl L. Naiden, who held that responsibility until mid-August.[15][c]

From its onset, the air route was predicated on operating two branches, unofficially deemed "commands": a "Trans-India Command" from India's western ports to

Rangoon, effectively cut Allied access to the Burma Road.[17] To maintain the uninterrupted supply to China, U.S. and other allied leaders agreed to organize a continual aerial resupply effort directly between Assam and Kunming.[14]

Airlift history

Haynes, 1942

C-47 Skytrain

Tenth Air Force was hampered by a constant diversion of men and aircraft to Egypt, where

DC-3s and flight crews were sent from the trans-Africa ferry route to outfit the new operation.[18][e] 25 other DC-3s requisitioned from American Airlines in the United States could not be moved to India due to lack of crews, and were later integrated into the complement of the first transport group committed to the airlift.[20]

The command structure of the India-China Ferry was fractured after senior officers in India and Burma made competing claims for jurisdiction, with part of the authority given to Gen.

Services of Supply, commanded in the CBI by Maj. Gen. Raymond A. Wheeler. The airlift was the final leg of a journey of 12,000 mi (19,000 km) from Los Angeles to China often taking four months.[22]

On 23 April 1942, Colonel

Air Corps Ferrying Command in June 1941 and pioneered overseas military air transport, including use of the South Atlantic air route by which aircraft, personnel, and cargo would reach India from the United States.[23] However, at the time the India-China Ferry was conceived, the ABC Ferry Command was not prepared to plan, control, or execute such an operation. Its formal organization was minimal, it had no units of its own, and its few aircraft were committed to establishing air transport routes.[24] By June, however, the ABC Ferry Command had begun a greatly expanded wartime restructuring, and became the Air Transport Command on 1 July.[25]

The first mission "over the hump" took place on 8 April 1942. Flying from the

Eastern Himalayan Uplift, which came to be known as the "high hump", or more simply, "The Hump".[3][g]

Meili Snow Mountains, prominent landmark on the high Hump

The official history of the Army Air Forces states:

The

Salween, and Mekong Rivers. The main "Hump", which gave its name to the whole awesome mountainous mass and to the air route which crossed it, was the Santsung Range, often 15,000 feet (4,600 m) high, between the Salween and Mekong Rivers. East of the Mekong the terrain became decidedly less rugged, and the elevations more moderate as one approached the Kunming airfield, itself 6,200 feet (1,900 m) above sea level.[13][30]

Unfavorable weather conditions along the route were a major contributing factor to its difficulty:

The Assam-Kunming route...[was situated]...in the middle of...three Eurasian air masses that were stirred and conflated by the presence of the Himalayas themselves. Moist warm air from the Indian Ocean to the south produced high pressure that swept north, while cold dry air from Siberia moved south. These lows and highs were extreme, producing violent winds...and when those winds hit the immovable mass that was the world's tallest mountain range, they shot upward at startling speeds until they cooled and then rushed downward in terrifying drafts that hurled airplanes...earthward at stupefying rates of descent...Turbulence inside the cloud mass was severe; pilots reported being flipped upside down by gusts, while many others were unable to report anything because they went missing. Hail, sleet, and torrential rains lashed the aircraft. Thunderstorms built suddenly...[into]...a whirling opaque world that not only meant no visibility but also frequently meant icing. The peaks of the Hump were waiting; the pilots called them "cumulo-granitus"...[31]

The point of view of a veteran crewman who flew the Hump was described in a feature story for a local newspaper years after:

... Let there be no question about it! Flying the Hump was risky business. The air route led first over the Himalayan foothills and finally to the mountains, between north Burma and west China, airspace where turbulence and abominable weather was the norm. Judge for yourself: [the name of] one of the peaks they flew over translated into English as "Elephant Head Gouge Mountain", because "when elephants use a game trail on its side, at one place they have to turn such a sharp corner that their tusks scrape grooves into the rock." ...[32]

Innumerable problems with the Indian railway system meant that aircraft assigned to the airlift often carried their cargo all the way from Karachi to China, while much cargo took as long to reach Assam from Karachi as the two-month journey by ship from the United States. India's highway and river systems were so undeveloped as to be unable to support the mission, leaving air as the only practicable way to supply China in anything resembling a timely fashion.[33]

The first crews and aircraft from the United States went to the 1st Ferrying Group,[h] arriving on 17 May at their base at the New Malir Cantonment near Karachi. The group was activated in India in March without personnel or equipment and was assigned to the operational control of the Tenth Air Force over the objections of the commander of ATC, who feared that its planes and crews would be steered into combat units, which did in fact occur at times.[34] Aircraft continued to arrive in small increments through October with flight crews consisting of airline pilots holding Air Corps Reserve commissions who had been called up for active duty specifically for the India-China assignment, and navigators, engineers and radiomen from the USAAF technical training schools.[35] For the remainder of 1942, the 62 C-47s[i] of the 1st Ferrying Group were the backbone of the airlift, flying both branches of the operation from Karachi until August, when it began a three months' relocation to Assam.[36]

In the first two months of the airlift the USAAF delivered only 700 tons of cargo and CNAC only 112 tons,

summer monsoon.[39][k] In July, CNAC quadrupled its tonnage to 221 tons, but 10AF C-47s brought only 85 net tons[l] of materiel and personnel into China.[41]

Tate, 1942

On 17 June 1942, Haynes continued on to China to take up an assignment as bomber commander of the China Air Task Force, Tenth Air Force's eastern appendage commanded by Brig. Gen. Claire L. Chennault. Scott was left in command for several days before he too was ordered to China to command the first U.S. fighter group in the CATF. On 22 June Col. Robert F. Tate (who like Haynes was a bombardment officer) was named to replace Haynes, but he was also in charge of the Trans-India Command in Karachi and remained in that capacity.[m] Lt. Col. Julian M. Joplin, acting at the direction of Naiden, for all practical purposes commanded India-China operations until 18 August. Tate took actual command on 25 August, when Naiden was forced to return to the United States,[n] although like Naiden he delegated direction of airlift operations to Joplin. Effective 15 July 1942,[42] the two branches of the India-China Ferry merged into the India-China Ferry Command, an organized component of the Tenth Air Force.[43]

Chabua Airfield. The white line at the top is the Brahmaputra River.

Tate was immediately and severely handicapped when the best pilots and 12 aircraft of the airlift went west to Egypt with Brereton on 26 June.[44] Despite the use of the 1st Ferrying Group, the buildup of the airlift grew very slowly during the summer monsoon.[45] Overuse of the small number of aircraft available, spotty maintenance, and a lack of spare parts led to numerous groundings until overhauls could be effected. In particular the lack of replacement tires and spare engines held down operations even after eight of the C-47s sent to the Middle East returned in August. For a short time engines intended for P-43 fighters of the Chinese Air Force were adapted for use on C-47s, but the supply of those proved small.[44]

Although three bases constructed by the British on tea plantations at Chabua,[o] Mohanbari,[p] and Sookerating[q] were declared operational in August 1942, and construction of a fourth began at Jorhat, none were expected to be ready for all-weather operations before November or December because of problems with unskilled indigenous labor and the failure of promised heavy equipment to arrive from the United States. Throughout the monsoon rains Dinjan remained the chief transport base.[46] The dismal results of the India-China Ferry to this point led to a proposal in Washington to turn over control of the operation entirely to CNAC, which would place U.S. military personnel in a combat area under foreign civilian control. Stilwell vigorously and successfully opposed the plan. He reinforced his position by insisting that CNAC lease its C-53s and crews participating in the airlift to the USAAF to assure that they would carry only essential cargo and not commercial activity.[47][48] Losses of transports increased sharply,[3] with the airlift's first loss to accident on 23 September 1942, presumably from icing.[49]

Protection of the aerial supply line became the primary mission of the Tenth Air Force. When the summer monsoon ended, the Japanese were expected to try to sever the last remaining connection to China, and although 10AF's CATF was adequate for the defense of the eastern end, little had been done to create an

antiaircraft defense around the four Assam airfields. The 51st Fighter Group was nominally responsible for fighter protection, but two of its three squadrons had been stripped of their aircraft and personnel in July to equip the group's third squadron and round out the newly activated 23rd Fighter Group, both in China with the CATF. The 51st FG remained in Karachi awaiting aircraft and personnel.[r] Requests for more antiaircraft guns, a weather squadron, and radios and landline communications equipment for an early warning system were immediately approved but went unfulfilled for a variety of reasons.[51][s] The India Air Task Force, the western combat force of the Tenth Air Force, was activated on 3 October with nine squadrons, none fully operational. Haynes was promoted to brigadier general and placed in command. The 51st FG had been re-equipped with P-40s, but had trained pilots sufficient for only one squadron, which Haynes sent to Dinjan.[53]

The long-anticipated air attack by the Japanese took place late in the afternoon of 25 October. 100 bombers and fighters, bombing from 10,000 feet (3,000 m) and strafing from 100 feet (30 m), achieved complete surprise. The only defense provided came from three

P-40s aloft on patrol, and six others which took off and gave pursuit. Dinjan and Chabua were heavily bombed, with nine transports and twenty fighters destroyed or badly damaged by low-level strafing. The next day Sookerating was strafed by 30 fighters, again without warning, but damage was confined to a single storage building containing food and medical supplies.[54][55] A third raid struck Chabua on 28 October but missed the field entirely. The India Air Task Force had flown reconnaissance missions over the captured airfield at Myitkyina all summer, but the Japanese mounted the raids from Lashio or bases in southern Burma, equipping their fighters with external fuel tanks.[56]

Haynes responded by moving the other squadron of the 51st FG to Sookerating, while the China Air Task Force was ordered to launch a series of attacks by B-25s against Lashio. While Chennault complied, he did not believe that the Japanese strikes originated there and the rift between him and Tenth Air Force grew wider. Whatever the case, the Japanese raids were not repeated in 1942.[56] In June 1943, following small, sporadic raids during the dry season, the entire fighter strength of the India Air task Force, amounting to less than 100 P-40s, was organized as the Assam American Air Base Command (later the 5320th Air Defense Wing, Provisional), specifically to protect the Assam airfields.[57]

Alexander, 1942–43

"In conformity with recently announced War Department policy and to provide more efficient operations of the India-China transport line the First Ferry Group will be taken over on December 1st by AAF Air Transport Command. Col. E. H. Alexander is being designated Commanding Officer of the India-China Wing, Air Transport Command, with selected professional operator as Assistant."
Marshall to Stilwell, 21 Oct. 42.[58]

The airlift was evaluated by the USAAF in October 1942 and the attitudes of Tenth Air Force's commanders regarding the feasibility of the operation were characterized as "defeatist".[59][t] Living conditions for airlift flight crews and support personnel, particularly at Dinjan, were described as "by far the worst in the entire theater",[60] with primitive quarters, poor sanitation, bad food and mess facilities, pervasive disease, and lack of recreation. Apathy became widespread and morale dropped to a "dangerous point," with the feeling among the troops that as part of the Tenth Air Force, they were "illegitimate children".[61]

After reviewing the evaluation, the Air Transport Command on 13 October offered to take over the operation. Eight days later it was instructed to do so effective 1 December 1942, and activated the India-China Wing ATC (ICWATC), commanded by Col. (later Brig. Gen.) Edward H. Alexander, who was Stilwell's air officer. Like Haynes, Alexander had been a founding member of ATC in 1941 as executive officer of the Ferrying Command. ICW reported directly to ATC's chief of staff in Washington, D.C., Col. (later Maj. Gen. and ATC deputy commander)

B-24 Liberator), which increased to 11 in March and a projected total of 50 by the end of the summer.[64][v]

USAAF Commanding General Henry H. Arnold observed first-hand the hazards of "flying the Hump" in February 1943 when the combat crew flying Argonaut, the B-17 that transported his party, became lost as they flew to Kunming following the Casablanca Conference.[65][66][w] From his experiences, Arnold later wrote:

A C-87 Liberator transport must consume three and a half tons of 100-octane gasoline flying the Hump over the Himalaya Mountains between India and Kunming (to get) four tons through to the Fourteenth Air Force. Before a bombardment group can go on a single mission in its B-24 Liberators, it must fly the Hump four times to build up its supplies.[67]

With the onset of heavy monsoon rains in March the ATC operation was reduced to operating from the only all-weather base at Chabua (the RAF base at Dinjan was now occupied by CNAC and Tenth Air Force's only P-40 group), but with a critical shortage in flight crews, even ATC's modest goal of 4,000 tons a month was impossible to attain.

B-24 Liberators into fuel transports to accomplish the task.[69] The 308th used Chabua airfield was already crowded with more than 80 ICW transports, and its lightly constructed runway was soon "going to pieces" under the weight of the bombers. Jorhat had stronger runways but its taxiways were still unpaved, making it unsuitable for four-engined aircraft. Both Sookerating and Mohanbari were due to have strong concrete runways capable of handling all aircraft, but neither was yet paved and monsoon rains made them inoperable.[70]

Curtiss C-46 Commando

The first of thirty Curtiss C-46 Commandos (an unproven cargo transport whose performance was significantly superior to the C-47's in cargo capacity and ceiling) arrived in India on 21 April 1943.[71] In May the 22nd Ferrying Group[y] began C-46 operations from the still uncompleted base at Jorhat, which had a concrete runway. In June, although the British—and later the U.S. Army's Services of Supply—failed to complete construction of all-weather runways at Mohanbari and Sookerating,[72] the activation of the 28th,[z] 29th,[aa] and 30th[ab] Transport Groups proceeded, an attempt to expand the C-46's role to meet projected levels of tonnage.[ac]

The severe shortage of crews led to pleas from Alexander for additional personnel. "Project 7" was set up by ATC at the end of June to fly nearly 2,000 men, 50 transports and 120 tons of materiel from Florida to India. Despite this, July's tonnage was less than half of its goal. The airfields were nowhere near completion, nearly all of the new pilots had been single-engine instructor pilots, specialized maintenance personnel and equipment had been sent by ship, and the complexities of the new C-46 (see Transport shortcomings below) had become evident. Scorching heat and torrential rains of the summer monsoon completed the undermining of the ambitious goals. The long-delayed work on existing fields resulted in intervention by Marshall in which he ordered Wheeler to have the Services of Supply complete the work by 1 July and issued a deadline of 1 September 1943 to have three additional fields ready for operations, but airfield construction problems were not overcome for several months.[75]

Hoag and Hardin, 1943–44

C-87 transport taking off

At his meeting with Arnold, Chiang warned that the price of China's cooperation with Stilwell to reconquer Burma was a 500-plane air force and delivery by the airlift of 10,000 tons a month.

Clayton L. Bissell recommended return of the operation to theater command, but Stratemeyer disagreed, as did Maj. Gen. Howard C. Davidson, who was about to replace Bissell in command of 10AF and had made an inspection tour of his own in June.[76][ad]

Frustration at the failure of the ICW to meet the Trident goals led Arnold to dispatch another inspection team to India in September 1943, led by ATC commander Maj. Gen. Harold L. George. Accompanying George was Col. Thomas O. Hardin, an aggressive former airline executive who had already been overseas a year as head of ATC's Central African Sector. On 16 September, George immediately reassigned Hardin to command the new Eastern Sector of the ICW, to invigorate India-China operations. Alexander was replaced in command of the ICW by Brig. Gen. Earl S. Hoag on 15 October.[79][ae] In addition to the changes in command, George instituted the "Fireball", a weekly C-87 express flight (see External links for photo essay) by the 26th Transport Group carrying critical spare parts for the transports from the Air Service Command Depot at Fairfield, Ohio, to the ATC service depot at Agra, India.[3][79]

Japanese fighters based in central Burma began to challenge the transport route near Sumprabum at the end of the summer monsoon. On 13 October 1943, a large number of Japanese fighters assisted by ground observers[80] evaded U.S. fighter patrols and shot down a C-46, a C-87, and a CNAC transport while damaging three others.[81] Despite the doubling of U.S. fighter patrols, similar interceptions on 20, 23, and 27 October shot down five more C-46s.[80] Japanese pilots referred to the shooting down of vulnerable transport aircraft as tsuji-giri ("cutting down a casually met stranger") or akago no te wo hineru ("twisting a baby's arm").[82] On the last of the interceptions a formation of B-24s on a reverse Hump mission, mistaken for C-87s, claimed eight fighters shot down.[80] Tenth Air Force immediately began attacks on Japanese airfields (Myitkyina was attacked 14 times before the end of the year, mostly by strafers and P-40s using 1000-lb bombs[83]), and ICW moved its route to Kunming even farther north. Only two more C-46s were shot down during the remainder of 1943, both in December.[84]

20 Japanese bombers escorted by 25 fighters bombed the Assam airfields on 13 December 1943 after several days of probing the early warning system without making an attack. Despite an increase in fighter patrols and an alarm issued, the defenders had only twelve minutes warning. U.S. interceptors were unable to climb to the 18,000-foot (5,500 m) altitude of the bombers in time to prevent the bombing, but it only caused slight damage. The raiding force was pursued and attacked, then ran head-on into fighter patrols returning from northern Burma. Serious losses to the raiders apparently convinced the Japanese not to repeat the attacks.[83][85]

Hardin altered operations by introducing night missions and refusing to cancel scheduled flights because of adverse weather or threat of interception. Although losses to accidents and enemy action increased, and replacements for the high number of C-46s lost ceased entirely for two months,[86] tonnage delivered rose sharply. The operation finally surpassed its objective in December with over 12,500 tons delivered to Kunming after new C-46s loaded with much-needed C-46 spare parts began arriving in numbers.[79][af] By the end of 1943, Hardin had 142 aircraft in operation: 93 C-46, 24 C-87, and 25 C-47.[8]

Presidential Unit Citation

President Roosevelt directed that the Presidential Unit Citation be awarded to the India-China Wing in recognition of their service. Hardin was given a month's leave in the United States, promoted to brigadier general, and as the representative of the wing received the award from General Arnold on 29 January 1944, the first awarded to a non-combat unit.[7][8] Hardin returned to the India China Wing in February 1944, just as the first of a trickle of four-engined Douglas C-54 Skymaster transports arrived in theater (see Operations on the low hump and in China below). With a maximum load ceiling of only 12,000 feet the C-54s were unable to hurdle the high Hump. Japanese interceptors blocked use of eastbound routes at lower altitudes and the C-54s were limited for the time being to freight movement within India or flights between the CBI and the continental United States.

Hardin advanced to command of the ICW on 21 March 1944 when Hoag was transferred to head ATC's European Wing.[88][ag] A month later, to give Hardin closer personal contact with his growing number of airbases,[89] ICW changed its headquarters from New Delhi to Rishra, north of Calcutta. There, on the 40-acre (160,000 m2) site of the Hastings Jute Mill, Stratemeyer, now a lieutenant general and commander of all USAAF forces in the CBI, established Hastings Army Air Base as the headquarters of the Army Air Forces India-Burma Theater, using a converted 8.5-acre (34,000 m2) mill building to house his headquarters, that of CBI Air Service Command, and ICWATC.[90][91][92] Under Hardin, tonnages increased, but so did expectations and frustrations; morale and safety concerns continued to plague the operation.[3] In the first 54 days of 1944, 47 transports were lost.[93] One transport was being lost for every 218 flights, an accident rate of 1.968 planes lost per thousand hours, of one life for every 162 trips flown or 340 tons delivered.[94][95]

In June 1944, after the capture of the Japanese fighter base at Myitkyina and at the behest of Brig. Gen.

Gaya[97] and used the service depots of the China-Burma-India Air Service Command at Panagarh, Agra, and Bangalore.[98]

Systems for identifying units and organizations assigned to the airlift changed several times between 1942 and 1945. The final change occurred on 1 August 1944 when the Air Transport Command discontinued the use of station numbers to identify its units and designated them as numbered "USAAF Base Units" with parenthetical modifiers describing their function. USAAF base units collectively identified all permanent party organizations, including flying units, at any particular non-combat base. The flying units were commonly denoted as lettered squadrons, i.e. "Squadron B", within the Base Unit.[92] To illustrate the various organizational changes affecting the India-China airlift, the unit at Chabua under 10AF deployed overseas as the 1st Ferrying Group. It was redesignated the 1st Transport Group on 1 December 1942 to denote that it was an ATC unit. Next it became Station No. 6 (APO 629 New York) on 1 December 1943 when for flexibility ATC no longer fielded groups or squadrons as units. Finally it became the 1333rd USAAF Base Unit (Foreign Transport Station) on 1 August 1944 in conformance with USAAF policy service-wide. Similarly, Headquarters Squadron, Eastern Sector, India-China Wing, established at Chabua on 16 September 1943 to administer the headquarters of the airlift, was redesignated the Headquarters Squadron, Assam Wing on 1 July 1944 when ATC reorganized itself into "divisions" and "wings"; and Squadron A, 1325th USAAF Base Unit (HQ Assam Wing) on 1 August 1944.[92][99]

Tunner, 1944–45

Brig. Gen. William H. Tunner

Hardin was brought back to the United States after spending two years overseas[ah] and command of the India-China Division went next to Tunner. Selected in the spring of 1944 to succeed Hardin, he chose his key staff and made a theater inspection trip in June that included piloting a C-46 over the Hump.[100] He took command on 4 September 1944 with orders not just to increase the tonnage delivered, but also to reduce the numbers of lives and aircraft lost in accidents,[94] and to improve morale in the India-China Division.[3] Tunner and his staff, using a "big business" approach,[30] completely turned around the operation, improved morale, and cut the aircraft loss ratio in half while doubling the amount of cargo delivered.

Tunner made extensive use of over 47,000 local laborers[101][102] and utilized at least one elephant to lift 55-gallon fuel drums into the aircraft.[3][103][ai] A daily direct flight called the "Trojan", flown by select C-54 crews, carried a minimum of five tons of highest priority materiel or passengers between Calcutta and Kunming, then brought back critically wounded patients or aircraft engines needing overhaul.[104] Each base was assigned both daily and monthly tonnage quotas to move over the Hump based on the type of aircraft it operated and its distance from the "Chinaside" airfields, as the crews referred to their destinations. Tunner immediately reinstituted military standards of dress, decorum (including inspections and parades), and behavior that had become slack in the previous year, for which he earned the nickname "Willie the Whip".[105]

In Tunner's first month of command, although the ICD delivered 22,314 tons to China, it still incurred an accident rate of 0.682 per thousand hours of flight.[106] By January 1945, Tunner's division had 249 aircraft and 17,000 personnel. It delivered more than 44,000 tons of cargo and passengers to China that month at an aircraft availability rate of 75%, but incurred 23 fatal crashes with 36 crewmen killed.[101] On 6 January a particularly fierce winter storm blew across the Himalayas from west to east, increasing the time of westbound trips by one hour, and caused 14 CNAC and ATC transports to be lost or written off, with 42 crewmen missing, the highest one-day loss of the operation.[26][107] The accident toll increased in the two months that followed, with 69 planes lost and 95 crewmen killed.[101]

To reduce losses due to mechanical failure, in February 1945 Tunner introduced a maintenance program termed Production Line Maintenance. PLM consisted of having each aircraft due for 50- or 200-hour maintenance towed through five to seven maintenance stations, depending on whether or not an engine change was required. Each station had a fresh maintenance crew trained for a specific service task, including engine run up, inspections, cleaning, technical repair, and servicing, a process that took nearly a full 24-hour day per aircraft to complete. Each base specialized in only one type of aircraft to simplify the process. Despite initial resistance, PLM was successfully implemented throughout the division.[108][109][aj]

Tunner also adopted two measures to lower the number of air mishaps due to inexperience and crew fatigue. To accomplish the first, he appointed Lt. Col. Robert D. "Red" Forman as division training officer to oversee both stringent training and a flying safety program led by Capt. Arthur Norden.[111] After 15 March 1945, the program intensified when Major John J. Murdock, Jr., took over the position of division flying safety officer.[112] Tunner also altered the personnel rotation policy of the ICD, which he saw as a major contributor to crew fatigue. Before Tunner took command, a pilot was rotated back to the United States after completing 650 flight hours over the Hump. Many pilots took advantage of this by flying daily, accumulating the required hours in as little as four months (average about 37 hours in the air every week). But these pilots overworked themselves; the division flight surgeon reported that half of all crewmen suffered from operational fatigue. So, from 1 March 1945, Tunner required all personnel to be in theater for twelve months to be eligible for rotation, which discouraged over-scheduling; he also increased the number of flight hours required to 750.[113]

Under Tunner, the India-China Division expanded to four wings in December 1944. The expansion was necessary to control the multiplicity of USAAF Base Units created as more airfields were opened.[ak] In addition to the Assam and India Wings, ICD added the Bengal Wing, headquartered at Tezgaon, to control C-54 operations, and the China Wing at Kunming. Tunner shifted his veteran commanders to provide leadership to the new wings. Cannon switched to the Bengal Wing, while Col. Richard F. Bromiley moved from the India Wing to the China Wing. Col. George D. "Lonnie" Campbell, Jr. succeeded to command of the Assam Wing.[114][al]

Both the accident rate and the raw number of accidents decreased notably as a result of these measures with the exception of the C-87/C-109 types, which remained 500% higher than on the C-54. Tunner called for their replacement entirely by C-54s and plans were drawn up to increase the Skymaster force to 272 by October 1945 and 540 by April 1946. With a fleet of 410 C-46s augmenting the ICD, the tonnage lift capability over the Hump was predicted to become more than 86,000 tons per month. A shortage of C-54 engines hampered the plan, which was modified to have a quarter of the force always in a pipeline between India and Florida for engine changes, carrying cargo and passengers as they traveled in both directions. The modified plan was approved in April 1945 and Morrison Field, Florida, was chosen for the maintenance but it proved an impediment to success when C-54s sent there remained at the field for periods five times the seven days originally estimated for turnaround.[115]

In July 1945, the last full month of operations, 662 aircraft of the India-China airlift delivered 71,042 tons, ICD's maximum monthly tonnage. Of this fleet, 332 were ICD transports, but 261 were combat aircraft from USAAF units temporarily assigned to the airlift.[116][am] An average of 332 flights to China was scheduled daily. The India-China Division ATC had 34,000 USAAF personnel assigned, and including indigenous civilians of all nationalities employed in India, Burma, and China, 84,000 persons overall. It boasted an aircraft availability rate of more than 85%. ICD suffered 23 major accidents in July, with 37 crewmen killed, but the Hump accident rate declined to .358 aircraft per thousand hours of flight in July (one-fifth of what it had been in January 1944) and .239 in August.[101][118]

On 1 August 1945, to celebrate "Air Force Day",[an] ICD laid on its largest mission of the airlift. Tunner wrote that ICD flew 1,118 round-trip sorties, averaging two per aircraft, and one C-54 logged three round trips in 22+14 hours of operations. 5,327 tons were delivered in one day without fatality, and with no major accidents.[119][ao] C-87s and C-109s carried 15% of the tonnage without mishap.[69] Before the month ended, nearly 50,000 more tons were delivered. Eight major accidents resulted in only 11 deaths, at a rate of one death for every 2,925 trips (1/18 of what it had been in January 1944).[95] The major accident rate of only 0.18 aircraft lost per 1000 hours was one-third of what it had been when Tunner took command, and one-eighth of that of January 1944.[95][120]

He considered ICD's safety record to be his greatest achievement. In his memoir Over the Hump, Tunner wrote:

If the high accident rate of 1943 and early 1944 had continued, along with the great increase in tonnage delivered and hours flown, America would have lost not 20 planes that month but 292, with a loss of life that would have shocked the world.[120]

Tunner commanded the division until 10 November 1945.[121] The deputy commander of ICD, former bomber commander Brig. Gen. Charles W. Lawrence, briefly commanded the division before it was disbanded on 15 November 1945.[122]

Operations on the low hump and in China

The first significant diversion of India-China Wing resources to operations in the region other than the Hump airlift began in February 1944. The Japanese attack in

CBI Theater, and Stratemeyer, who in addition to all his other duties commanded SEAC's Eastern Air Command, which for all practical purposes made him Mountbatten's air commander.[126][ap] After the request was approved, ICW provided 25 C-46s as the equivalent of 38 C-47s.[127][aq] These were attached to the EAC Troop Carrier Command[ar] to support the British and were used to fly the personnel and light equipment of the 5th Indian Division to Imphal and Dimapur, where it arrived in time to thwart the Japanese offensive.[128]

Douglas C-54 Skymaster

The next month, to reinforce Stilwell's planned offensive into Burma, the ICW flew 18,000 Chinese troops west across the Hump to Sookerating, which resulted in a net reduction to the India-China effort of at least 1,500 tons.[123] However, the capture in May 1944 of Myitkyina airfield by American and Chinese troops of Stilwell's command deprived the Japanese of their principal fighter airfield threatening Allied aircraft flying the Hump. The field immediately became an emergency landing strip for Allied aircraft even though fighting continued in Myitkyina town until August 1944. ICD continued its contribution to this success by flying in from southern India a regimental-sized force of combat engineers and their support, including heavy equipment, for airfield construction. The capture of Myitkyina allowed ICD C-54s, which had ceiling limitations that precluded flying Route Able (the High Hump),[3] the regular use of a second, more direct route, designated Route Baker but unofficially dubbed the "Low Hump".[129][130]

In October 1944, after Gen. Tunner took command of the India-China Division of Air Transport Command, increased numbers of C-54s, sometimes escorted by Allied fighters based at Myitkyina, greatly increased tonnage levels flown to China from India. The C-54, which could at ten tons carry five times the cargo load of the C-47 and twice that of the C-46, replaced both twin-engined transports as the primary lifter of the operation.[30] The expansion of bases resulted in the formation of eastbound Routes Easy, Fox, Love, Nan, and Oboe, and of westbound Route King.

Support of XX Bomber Command

From April 1944 to January 1945, the India-China Division was also tasked with supporting

B-29 Superfortress strategic bombing campaign against Japan from forward bases around Chengtu in central China. Arnold originally envisioned Matterhorn units as being self-sustaining, bringing in their own fuel in hundreds of C-109s (see Transport shortcomings below) and other materiel using B-29s and 20 C-87s as their own "air transport service". The concept proved to be flawed from the outset when the planned 300-bomber force was reduced to a single combat wing of 150 bombers before it left the United States.[131] B-29s of the XX Bomber Command, stripped of guns and other equipment and fitted with four bomb bay tanks, were used as fuel tankers while tactical aircraft hauled other supplies, including bombs, but were unable to bring enough materiel over the Hump from their permanent bases around Calcutta in India to begin missions. XX BC turned to ICD for additional support when its target date for commencement of missions was repeatedly postponed.[132]

Curtiss C-46 Commando

ATC's North African Wing had already provided stopgap support by transporting 250 spare B-29 engines to the CBI in April and May 1944, using 25 C-54s over a 6,200 mi (10,000 km) shuttle route from the port of Casablanca to Calcutta that came to be called the "Crescent Blend"[as] until three special mission C-46 squadrons—created in early 1944 under the code name "Moby Dick"—were ready to carry out supply operations for XX Bomber Command.[134] Designated the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Air Transport Squadrons (Mobile), each was intended to be a self-contained unit of twenty C-46s, flight crews, maintenance and engineering specialists, and a full complement of station operation personnel, although when first committed the service elements had not yet been integrated. They arrived in the CBI in June 1944, with the 1st and 2nd MATS based at Kalaikunda, West Bengal, taking over the "Crescent Blend" shuttle and bringing in over 100 spare engines per month, while the 3rd MATS was sent forward to the ICD base at Kunming to augment the India-China airlift.[135]

Of 42,000 tons of materiel delivered before XX BC abandoned its China bases and returned to India, the ICD moved almost two-thirds.

Robert S. McNamara created a statistical control section to create adjustable schedules that tracked the variable.[138][139]

XX BC had the unfortunate coincidence of arriving in the theater just as the Japanese started a major offensive in East China to open a corridor for lines of communication to its forces in Indochina, seize the airfields of Chennault's Fourteenth Air Force situated in that corridor, and possibly knock China out of the war.[140] The load allocations that ICD had to commit to XX BC early on caused "mutual recriminations" between XX BC, ICD and Chennault, from whom most of the altered allocation tonnage was taken, with each blaming the other for problems that ensued.[141] The Japanese offensive continued inexorably all summer and into the fall, threatening the efficacy if not the very existence of 14AF.[142] Relations were never entirely smoothed with Chennault, but workable compromises were eventually fashioned by Stratemeyer, Hardin and Tunner to accomplish the tasks necessary to keep 14AF in the fight.[143] Supplying Matterhorn during the concurrent crisis did have the positive effect of increasing the resources and effort committed to the airlift, and recognition by all involved that ICD was the only agency that could efficiently handle the logistics.[144]

When ATC reorganized on 1 August, the MATS squadrons maintained a separate identity from the newly created USAAF Base Units, but each flew hundreds of Hump missions, delivering aviation fuel and engines.[145] Because India-China operations were of extraordinary length from Kalaikunda—requiring an intermediate stop at Jorhat—its two squadrons were transferred to ICD when XX Bomber Command began planning the reduction of its operations in November 1944.[146] On 30 October the 2nd MATS moved to Dergaon, East Bengal, and later to Luliang, China, where it was disbanded in June 1945 and became Squadron B, 1343rd USAAF Base Unit.[147]

Operations Grubworm and Rooster

Because C-47s and C-46s which landed in China were temporarily beyond ATC control, they were constantly being diverted for local emergencies by Chennault's and China Theater commander Lt. Gen.

Albert C. Wedemeyer's forces, disrupting the flight crew rest and aircraft maintenance schedules necessary to maintain tonnage. To alleviate the situation and also provide the additional support needed by the combat forces, 50 C-47s and 20 C46s were permanently based in China after October 1944 for internal movement of cargo and to assist the India-China airlift when gaps in local scheduling permitted.[148]
Most of the remaining C-47s were eventually sent to bases in Burma and continued India-China missions over the lower routes. They proved their continuing usefulness by playing prominent roles in various support missions within China in 1944 and 1945.

Between 5 December 1944 and 5 January 1945, C-46s and crews were attached to the Tenth Air Force to augment "Operation Grubworm".[149][at] This was the relocation of the 14th and 22nd Chinese Divisions, located in reserve on the Stilwell Road near Myitkyina, to bases around Kunming. Chiang and Wedemeyer proposed to the Combined Chiefs of Staff, over the objections of Mountbatten, to relocate the divisions to counter a Japanese offensive seeking to capture the Kunming airfields. The operation was approved with the proviso that it not strain Tenth Air Force's extensive air transport system supplying Allied ground operations in Burma. IDC provided the C-46s of the mobile air transport squadrons and all of its China Wing C-47s to provide the necessary augmentation.[150][au]

The 2nd MATS moved in entirety from its base at Dergaon to Luliang Field, China, completing the deployment by December 13.[147] The 1st MATS operated from Ledo, and ICD's 1348th USAAF Base Unit at Myitkyina South airfield coordinated the entire operation and provided the staging base for refueling all transports. The C-46s moved the 14th Division from five airfields in Burma, including a field at Nansin whose construction was completed December 4. Takeoffs there were subject to artillery and sniper fire. The 1348th Base Unit scheduled operations 24 hours a day and in bad weather, although the operation was suspended between 16 and 22 December when the situation in China seemed improved. Of the six pick-up fields, only Myitkyina South was capable of night operations,[149] and troop carrier C-47s were used to shuttle troops there during the day for ICD aircraft to fly over the Hump at night.[151]

The mobile air transport squadrons were familiar with the Burma airfields and so were selected to fly the operation. Showing unusual flexibility in planning, the 1348th Base Unit quartered incoming troops near airfields, supplied them, monitored the availability of aircraft and crews, divided the troops into planeloads, and kept Chinese units and their materiel intact. Briefings and fuelings were conducted at Myitkyina South, the planes flew to their pickup fields and loaded, and then flew back to Myitkyina South for a final refueling before flying on to China. The 1348th Base Unit control tower performed all air traffic control of aircraft to and from China.[151]

Grubworm lifted 25,009 Chinese troops, 396 Americans, 1,596 draft animals, 42 jeeps and 144 pieces of artillery in 24 days of flying.[152] ICD crews provided 597 of the 1328 sorties of the operation and moved more than 14,000 of the troops involved.[99] Although three C-47s were lost during the operation, ICD had no losses.[152][av] When the Japanese offensive shifted to seize the Fourteenth Air Force bases at Suichwan and Kanchow, the 2nd ATS evacuated the bases in a single day on 22 January.[147][153]

Between March and May 1945, the ICD carried the first American combat troops into China when it redeployed the two American regiments of the

Hsiang valley to reinforce the defense of the 14th AF base there. ICD flew 1,648 sorties, delivering 25,136 troops; 2,178 horses; and 1,565 tons of materiel; for a total of 5,523 tons. 369 tons of aviation gasoline was also carried to Chihkiang for 14th AF use[119]

Operational difficulties

Building a capability

The task facing the Tenth Air Force of creating an airlift was daunting at minimum, emphasizing all that the Army Air Forces lacked in April 1942: no units tasked for moving cargo, no experience in organized airlift by the USAAF or its predecessor Air Corps, and no airfields for basing units. In addition, flying in the region was made more difficult by a lack of reliable charts, an absence of radio navigation aids, and a dearth of weather data.[3]

In 1942 Chiang Kai-shek insisted that at least 7,500 tons per month were needed to keep his field divisions in operation, but this figure proved unattainable for the first fifteen months of the India-China airlift.[156] The 7,500 total was first exceeded in August 1943, by which time objectives had been increased to 10,000 tons a month. Ultimately monthly requirements surpassed 50,000 tons.[101]

Slowly, however, an airlift of unprecedented scale began to take shape. Construction of four new bases was begun in 1942, and by 1944 the operation flew from six all-weather airfields in Assam. By July 1945 the air corridor from India began at thirteen airfields strung out along the

Brahmaputra valley,[157] with seven in Assam , four in the Bengal valley, and two near Calcutta,[158][ax] and terminated at six Chinaside airfields around Kunming.[158][ay]

Through July 1944 the flight corridor for the India-China airlift was fifty miles wide with a highly restrictive vertical clearance. As bases expanded and the Low Hump route came into use, the corridor widened to 200 miles (320 km) and 25 charted routes, with a vertical clearance of 10,000–25,000 MSL in the south, permitting highly congested but controlled operations at all hours.[159]

Transport shortcomings

A critical problem proved to be finding a cargo aircraft capable of carrying heavy payloads at the high altitudes required, and three types were tried before the opening of a low Hump route permitted the use of C-54s: C-47 and variants, C-46, and C-87/C-109.

Initially, the India-China airlift was flown with the Douglas DC-3 and its military versions, the C-47, C-53 and C-39. However, the DC-3 design's fuselage was so high off the ground that loading from most truck beds was difficult, and its narrow door and weak floor could not sustain heavy cargo. Although C-47s had reinforced flooring and a wider door, they still required specialized loading equipment for much of the cargo needed in China and had a limited payload capacity.[160] Also, performance specifications of the Douglas transports were not suited to high-altitude operation with heavy payloads, and could not normally reach an altitude sufficient to clear the mountainous terrain, forcing the planes to attempt a highly dangerous route through the maze-like Himalayan passes.[161]

C-109 tanker

The introduction in January 1943 of the Consolidated C-87 Liberator Express, a design modification of the B-24D heavy bomber, boosted tonnage figures. Its high-altitude capability enabled it to surmount the lower mountains (15,000–16000 feet MSL) without resorting to the passes, but the type had a high accident rate and was unsuited to the airfields then in use. Despite having four engines, the C-87 climbed poorly with heavy loads, as did its bomber counterparts, and often crashed on takeoff if an engine failed. Its poor cockpit illumination was inadequate for bad weather flying and often failed during instrument takeoffs, its electrical and hydraulic systems frequently froze at high altitude and malfunctioned, and its flight deck heating system was prone to produce either stifling heat or none at all.[162] Attributed by its pilots to its slim Davis wing, the C-87 also had a tendency to spin out of control when encountering even mild icing conditions over the mountains. One Hump pilot called the variant "an evil, bastard contraption" and a "ground-loving bitch" that "could not carry enough ice to chill a highball".[163][164]

Despite its shortcomings, the C-87 was valued for the reliability of its engines, speed that enabled it to reduce significantly the effect of head and cross winds, a service ceiling that allowed it to surmount most weather fronts, and range that permitted its crews to fly "pressure-front" patterns that chased favorable winds.[165]

Another Liberator transport variant, the

C-109, carried gasoline in converted B-24Js or B-24Ls. All combat equipment was removed and eight flexible bag fuel tanks were installed inside the fuselage with a 2,900 U.S. gallon capacity. 70 were initially planned to fly the Hump with XX Bomber Command, beginning in September 1944, but most of the 218 C-109 conversions eventually served in the CBI under ATC after B-29 operations were shifted from China back to India. At least 80 were involved in major accidents between September 1944 and August 1945. Like the C-87, they were not popular with their crews,[az] since they were very difficult to land when fully loaded, particularly at airfields above 6,000 feet (1,800 m) altitude such as Kunming, and often had unstable flight characteristics when all eight cargo tanks were full. A crash landing of a loaded C-109 inevitably resulted in an explosion and crew fatalities, earning it the nickname "C-One-Oh-Boom".[3][166]

C-46 Commando China Doll

The Curtiss C-46 Commando began to fly India-China missions in May 1943. The C-46 was a large twin-engine aircraft capable of flying faster and higher than any previous medium-range cargo aircraft, and could carry heavier loads than either the C-47 or the C-87, albeit at two and one half times the unit cost of a C-47.[167][168] With the C-46, airlift tonnage increased significantly, surpassing objectives with 12,594 tons in December 1943. Loads continued to increase throughout 1944 and 1945, reaching an all-time maximum tonnage in July 1945.[167][169] Performance of the Commando was enhanced when camouflage paint, standard on all USAAF aircraft until February 1944, was removed to reduce weight and provide five extra knots of speed.[3]

While becoming the medium-range workhorse of the Hump airlift, the C-46 throughout its service experienced frequent mechanical failures (in particular, a tendency to engine failure and fuel leaks that puddled at the wing root to become an explosion hazard) that led to such unflattering sobriquets Air Force-wide as "Dumbo" and "Plumber's Nightmare",[170] and among ATC crews as the "flying coffin".[171] In its first five months of operations, 20% of the C-46s assigned to the airlift crashed.[172] When it first arrived in theater, in addition to being accompanied by technical orders that required 50 field modifications before it could be flown operationally,[173][ba] the C-46 also required additional training for inexperienced crews, and a transition school was established that drained the airlift of ten aircraft and crews. Worse, spare parts were in such scarce supply until the fall of 1943 that 26 of the first 68 C-46s sent were out of commission.[97]

Flight hazards

Flying over the Hump proved to be an extremely hazardous undertaking for Allied flight crews. The air route wound its way into the

high mountains and deep gorges between north Burma and west China, where violent turbulence, 125 to 200 mph (320 km/h) winds,[26][107]
icing, and inclement weather conditions were a regular occurrence. Lack of suitable navigational equipment, radio beacons, and inadequate numbers of trained personnel (there were never enough navigators for all the groups) continually affected airlift operations.

In the first year of the airlift, inexperienced officers of the Services of Supply

Reno Army Air Force Base (Nevada) turned out a growing number of C-46 crews, were highly qualified replacements more readily available for the airlift.[175]

Still, American and CNAC pilots often flew daily on round-trip flights, and around the clock. Some exhausted crews flew as many as three roundtrips every day, particularly during the Hardin rotation policy. Mechanics serviced planes in the open, using tarpaulins to cover the engines during the frequent downpours, and suffered burns to exposed flesh from sun-heated bare metal. There were not enough mechanics or spare parts to go around during the first two years of operations; maintenance and engine overhauls were often deferred. Many overloaded planes crashed on takeoff after mechanical trouble such as an engine failure. Author and ATC pilot Ernest K. Gann recalled flying into Chabua and witnessing four air crashes in one day: two C-47s, two C-87s and 32 killed. He commented with grim sarcasm, "Not to be confused with a combat operation."[176] Due to the isolation of the area, as well as the lower priority of the CBI theater, parts and supplies to keep planes flying were in short supply before the onset of the "Fireball", and flight crews were often sent into the Himalayan foothills to cannibalize aircraft parts from the numerous crash sites. At times, monthly aircraft losses totaled 50% of all aircraft then in service along the route. A byproduct of the numerous air crashes was a local boom in native wares made from aluminum crash debris.[3]

In addition to losses from weather and mechanical failure, the unarmed and unescorted transport aircraft flying the Hump were occasionally attacked by Japanese fighters.

.50 caliber machine guns fuselage-mounted in front of the cargo doors of their aircraft, but there is no documented instance of their being used.[179]

Search and rescue

L-5 Sentinel

The high number of losses resulted in the formation at Jorhat in July 1943 of one of the first

Japanese Zero fighters during a search mission and crashed at the Indian border trying to return to base.[30][181]

When Tunner took command of ICD, he was dissatisfied with the existing search-and-rescue set-up, deeming it "a cowboy operation". He appointed the operations officer at Mohanbari, former Hump pilot Major Donald C. Pricer, to establish "a thoroughgoing and efficient search and rescue organization". Pricer's 90 men of the 1352nd Base Unit (Search and Rescue) at Mohanbari used four B-25s, a C-47, and an L-5, painted yellow overall with blue wing bands for easy identification, to conduct the search missions. Pricer also charted all known crash sites to eliminate checking previous wrecks, and on occasion called upon a Sikorsky YR-4 helicopter based at Myitkyina to assist in rescue missions.[182]

The Hump Express, in its last edition on 15 November 1945, reported:

The unit has been responsible for all search and rescue work from Bhamo, in Burma, north as far as allied planes regularly fly. Roughly, its jurisdiction extended from Tezpur, India to Yunnanyi [zh], China. Before organized search and rescue, crews had been lost for weeks, sometimes months. Stretches up to 90 days were not unknown in a country where jungle thickets and dizzy mountain trails made each hour a nightmare to the lost crews fighting their way out. But today, ICD's unique outfit probably would have made the story a trifle less stark. Aerial supply drops of maps and pertinent homing information would have made the walk-out perhaps less circuitous, while certainly the hardships would have been alleviated by air-dropped medical supplies, food and clothing. S & R members have parachuted to lost aircrews to furnish medical aid and walkout assistance. As a direct result of the unit's work, the percentage of saved personnel steadily mounted and with it the confidence and assurance of ICD flight crews.[183]

Statistical summary of operations

ATC operations accounted for 685,304 gross tons of cargo carried eastbound during hostilities, including 392,362 tons of gasoline and oil, with nearly 60% of that total delivered in 1945. ATC aircraft made 156,977 trips eastbound between 1 December 1943, and 31 August 1945, losing 373 aircraft.

Rangoon, the airlift's total tonnage of 650,000 net tons dwarfed that of the Ledo Road (147,000 tons).[3]
In addition to cargo, 33,400 persons were transported, in one or both directions.

CNAC pilots made a key contribution to India-China flight operations. Between 1942 and 1945, the Chinese received 100 transport aircraft from the United States: 77 C-47s and 23 C-46s. Of the eventual 776,532 gross tons and approximately 650,000 net tons transported over the Hump, CNAC pilots accounted for 75,000 tons (about 12%).[95] The India-China airlift continued beyond the end of the war. The final missions of the ICD, made after most of its attached organizations had departed, were the transporting of 47,000 U.S. personnel west over The Hump from China to Karachi for return to the United States.[185]

The maximum aircraft strength of the India-China Division, ATC (31 July 1945) was 640 aircraft:[184] 230 C-46s, 167 C-47s, 132 C-54s, 67 C-87/C-109s, 33 B-25s, 10 L-5s, and 1 B-24.[186]

Gen. Tunner's final report stated that the airlift "expended" 594 aircraft.[95][bc] At least 468 American and 41 CNAC aircraft were known lost from all causes, with 1,314 air crewmen and passengers killed. In addition, 81 more aircraft were never accounted for, with their 345 personnel listed as missing. Another 1,200 personnel had been rescued or walked back to base on their own.[3][167]

The final summary of logged flight time in the airlift totalled 1.5 million hours. The India-China ferrying operation was the largest and most extended strategic air bridge (in volume of cargo airlifted) in aviation history until it was surpassed in 1949 by the

Berlin airlift, an operation also commanded by Gen. Tunner.[187]
Tunner, writing in Over the Hump, described the significance of the India-China Airlift:

Once the airlift got underway, every drop of fuel, every weapon, and every round of ammunition, and 100 percent of such diverse supplies as

C rations, every such item used by American forces in China was flown in by airlift. Never in the history of transportation had any community been supplied such a large proportion of its needs by air, even in the heart of civilization over friendly terrain...After the Hump, those of us who had developed an expertise in air transportation knew that we could fly anything anywhere anytime.[188]

From 1942 to 1944, 98 percent of all US lend-lease to China went directly to US Army units in China, not the Chinese military.[189]

Notable Hump airlift participants

Notable people involved in the Hump airlift, and their later careers, included:

See also

  • Fort Hertz covered an airstrip in Northern Burma which served as an emergency landing ground for planes flying the Hump.
  • Hengduan Mountains
  • South-East Asian Theatre of World War II

Notes

Explanatory footnotes

  1. ^ Also called the Assam-Burma-China Ferry Command. The "command" was ad hoc and not an official designation, as was that of its partner branch, the Trans-India "Command".
  2. ^ Delivery of four tons per day per aircraft was theoretically feasible under ideal conditions of terrain, weather, and aircraft availability.
  3. ^ "India-China Ferry" was an unofficial descriptive of the system used in official correspondence, and not an organized command. On 16 July 1942 the "India-China Ferry Command" became an official command by order of the Tenth Air Force.
  4. raid on Japan
    .
  5. ^ On 18 February 1942, to protect the route from the Vichy French, the Air Corps Ferry Command militarized Pan Am's operations in Africa. Concurrently it also cancelled all overseas contracts with the civil air carriers except those in the Western Hemisphere.[19]
  6. ^ The original plan had been to haul fuel over the Hump for use by the Aquila Force, an advanced heavy bomber detachment of the Tenth AF intended to bomb Japan from eastern China. Haynes had been the detachment commander and Scott a volunteer member before the plan was cancelled in favor of the B-25 raid.
  7. ^ While the region and the operation were universally known as "the hump", crews flying the airlift also called the mountainous barrier the "Rockpile".[28][29]
  8. ^ Also seen as the "1st Ferry Froup," consisting of the 3rd, 6th, and 13th Ferrying Squadrons
  9. ^ The group began with 75 transports, but thirteen were diverted to the Middle East en route to India. Of the 62 that reached India between May and October, 15 were destroyed by the end of 1942.[36]
  10. Bren guns, 8 tons of bombs, 1.5 tons of radio equipment, a 1.5-ton jeep, two small aircraft, 46 tons of aircraft spare parts, 7 tons of medical supplies, 38 tons of food, 15 tons of "other" and "special" equipment, and two tons of cigarettes".[38]
  11. ^ The summer monsoon begins in mid-May and typically lasts until the end of October, during which time 200 inches of rain is common in Assam.[40]
  12. ^ "Net tons" excludes the weight of fuel transported to China to enable the return of the aircraft to India.
  13. ^ Because of the slowness of reinforcements in reaching the CBI, the Trans-India Command was never formally manned or equipped with its own personnel and aircraft in its three months of existence. Loaded aircraft of the ABC Ferry Command were transited to and from Karachi carrying out both missions, and Tate remained in Karachi to coordinate their movements.[5]
  14. ^ Weaver states the return was for a "stomach disorder". However other sources indicate the abrasive Naiden may have been insubordinate to a British general officer, and one alleges that Stilwell had him relieved for "financial impropriety". Whatever the case, Naiden was reduced back to colonel on November 6 and held two training commands before his death in 1944.
  15. ^ All-weather base, headquarters of 1st Ferrying Group, with 3rd Ferrying Squadron based there.
  16. ^ Base of the 6th Ferrying Squadron until the end of the dry monsoon.
  17. ^ Base of the 13th Ferrying Squadron until the end of the dry monsoon.
  18. ^ The 51st arrived in India on March 12. It had originally sailed for the Philippines before 7 Dec 41 but had been recalled, reassigned, diverted and delayed since the start of the war. All but 10 of its original complement of 70 P-40s had been diverted by ship to reinforce Java and had been lost at sea at the end of February.[50]
  19. ^ An example of the exasperating difficulties encountered by 10AF was its request for radio equipment for 20 early warning stations. Even though only five sets were approved, and there was no delay in transferring personnel to operate them, the equipment was lost. It was eventually traced to Natal, Brazil, where it have been unloaded and then forgotten. It finally arrived in India in 1943 just before the next wet monsoon would halt Japanese air operations.[52]
  20. ^ The study was conducted for the USAAF Inspector General "in the field" by Frank D. Sinclair, Aviation Technical Adviser of China Defense Supplies, Inc.[59]
  21. ^ A tactical airlift historian makes the claim that the transfer of the airlift to ATC was "actually a violation of the orders under which the USAAF had been formed," reasoning that as a "USAAF organization" ATC usurped "a responsibility of air forces under theater command." Because the India-China Ferry Command was a theater operation, it should therefore remain under a theater commander.[63] Aside from the fact that the transfer was approved and commanded by the Army Chief of Staff on the basis of a strategic planning judgment made by the commanding general of the USAAF, a fellow member of the Joint Chiefs, the argument misses the point that the USAAF was forced to create the India-China Ferry Command as a combat organization because no other resources were yet available, and as such was vulnerable to conflicting demands from commanders in the theater that degraded its effectiveness. The issue had historically been the major point of contention between the Air Corps and ground forces since 1920 and the initial setup of the airlift went against Air Corps thinking if not doctrine. The USAAF then disbanded the India-China Ferry Command, which removed the airlift from the purview of theater command, and replaced it with a non-combat operation using resources (ATC) that had not been available seven months earlier, making it subject to fewer diversions from its mission. It was part of a global supply chain that passed through several theaters getting to India, making that independence even more crucial. 10AF had coveted the airlift as a means of acquiring needed tactical airlift assets, but would soon receive transports of its own, and thus freed of the airlift burden, could concentrate on its combat responsibilities.[62] McGowen's criticism approached the transfer from the point of view of a modern Air Force (i.e. independent service) tactical airlift partisan to whom such considerations were moot.
  22. ^ However from the outset the C-87s proved to be both difficult and very dangerous to handle and reinforcements were hard-pressed to keep up with losses.
  23. direction finder
    . Argonaut landed shortly before two in the morning, four hours overdue.
  24. ^ The 308th BG was commanded by Arnold's protégé and former personal pilot, Col. Eugene H. Beebe.
  25. ^ The "Ferrying" designation for the group and its 77th, 78th, and 88th Ferrying Squadrons was changed to "Transport" on July 1.
  26. ^ Based at Tezpur; 96th, 97th, 98th Transport Squadrons.
  27. ^ Based at Sookerating; 99th, 100th, 301st Transport Squadrons.
  28. ^ Based at Mohanbari; 302nd, 303rd, 304th Transport Squadrons.
  29. ^ The use of "groups" and component "squadrons" to identify ATC units continued until 1 December 1943, when ATC discarded the group/squadron system and its standardized tables of personnel and equipment, determining the size of its flying units within any wing by exact manning requirements for each base controlled by the wing, giving it the flexibility of moving men and planes around within the wing to meet mission requirements. After 1 December, units were identified by the station numbers of their bases.[73][74]
  30. ^ Thus when Davidson became 10AF commander on 19 Aug 1943 and Stratemeyer the commanding general of the newly-activated "Headquarters, United States Army Air Forces, India-Burma Sector, China-Burma-India" the next day, control of ICWATC was specifically excluded from both commands.[78]
  31. ^ Alexander later commanded both the Caribbean and Southwest Pacific Wings of ATC.
  32. ^ The 40 C-46s were part of Project 8, an operation to support construction of a gasoline pipeline between China and Assam. 16 new C-47s arrived in November bringing in the ground crews for Project 8 aircraft. Impetus for the pipeline slowed and Project 8 was integrated into the India-China operation, operating from a new base at Misamari. The delay in replacing C-46s had been the result of a modification program to correct the problems experienced during its initial India-China operations.[87]
  33. ^ The transfer was not entirely routine. The fearful losses suffered by the ICW in the first seven weeks of 1944 prompted Arnold to send C. R. Smith on an emergency inspection trip to India, where Smith met with Hoag. He was appalled to find that the ICW commander was headquartered a thousand miles to the west of his bases, the result of an agreement between George and Stratemeyer, acting at the behest of Stilwell. Although the arrangement did not result as feared by ATC in undue influence by Stratemeyer's staff on Hoag's, the ICW commander had never flown the Hump himself as a result and received all his information from written reports. Smith did fly the Hump during his inspection, however, and it was he who recommended Hardin take over the wing.
  34. ^ Hardin commanded the West Coast and Central Pacific Wings of ATC.
  35. ^ Essentially a publicity stunt, Tunner had an elephant and mahout recruited at Misamari, with the animal named, appropriately enough, "Miss Amari". Photographs also appeared of an elephant named "Elmer" lifting a drum, but their veracity and that of the practice as being standard is not documented.
  36. ^ PLM later became standard practice throughout the USAAF.[110]
  37. ^ ICD was in charge of 60 USAAF base units at some point between December 1943 and December 1945.
  38. ^ Cannon and Bromiley, along with "Red" Forman, became USAF brigadier generals with the Military Air Transport Service.
  39. ^ The augmentation was ordered by Stratemeyer when units no longer had a combat mission and the airlift, allocated nearly 49,000 tons for delivery in April 1945 (an increase of 350% from the allocation of 14,000 tons the month Tunner took command), delivered only 44,000. The 7th and 308th Bomb Groups and 443rd Troop Carrier Group operated from India, while the 1st, 3rd, and 4th Combat Cargo Groups were based at Myitkyina. These groups carried more than 20,000 tons in July and 11,000 tons in August.[117]
  40. ^ Histories (including Tunner 1955) refer to "Army Air Forces Day", but contemporary documents including the Hump Express consistently call it "Air Force Day".
  41. ^ However one accident did occur when a C-46 made a wheels-up landing. Whether or not Tunner considered this a major accident is unknown.
  42. ambassador at large to handle just such problems. Command of EAC had been added to his responsibilities of coordinating ATC airlift activities for Arnold, controlling supply and training of 14AF for Chiang, and defense of the India-China bases and air routes for the US. Joint Chiefs.[124]
  43. ^ Taylor writes that the British originally wanted 63 C-47s. After review by Gen. William D. Old and Air Marshal John Baldwin, the recommended figure was 38, which was agreed to by Lt. Gen. William J. Slim. The EAC chief of staff, USAAF Brig. Gen. Charles B. Stone, then concluded 30 was sufficient. Mountbatten changed it back to 38 for the formal request to the U.S. chiefs of staff.[127]
  44. ^ EAC Troop Carrier Command was commanded by Brig. Gen. William Old, who had flown the initial mission over the Hump in 1942.
  45. ^ The route was a "blend" of sea and air transport totaling 9,800 mi (15,800 km) from Newark, New Jersey, to Casablanca to Calcutta. The C-54s used were known as "Mission 10".[133]
  46. ^ The operation was planned as "Operation Glow Worm", but changed when Tenth Air Force Col. S.D. Grubbs was placed in charge.
  47. ^ The China Wing C-47s were assigned to haul newly trained Chinese troops from North China to Yunnan Province.[150]
  48. ^ 2nd MATS did have a C-46 go missing on a regular India-China mission on 16 December.
  49. ^ The C-47s were those internally based in China.
  50. Kurmitola (1345th BU, C-54) in Bangladesh
    .
  51. ^ Yunnanyi [zh] (1338th BU), Kunming (1340th BU), Yangkai (1341st BU), Chanyi (1342nd BU), Luliang (1343rd BU), and Loping (1359th BU). As many as ten airfields near Kunming and Chengdu served as China terminals when the B-29 XX Bomber Command was in operation.
  52. ^ C-109 crews were assigned from surplus B-29 crews of the XX Bomber Command.
  53. ^ By November 1943 the number of required field modifications had risen to over 700.
  54. ^ ATC did not at any time have control of personnel or units responsible for loading.[174]
  55. ^ "Expended" includes aircraft destroyed during Japanese air raids and a large number of transports written off ("Class 26 accident") as too expensive or too damaged to warrant repair. Except for those lost to Japanese interceptors, all ATC losses during flight were USAAF Form 14 losses, "other than combat."
  56. ^ Cole remained in the CBI as a Hump pilot until 29 April 1943 and was the pilot of the first C-87 mission over the Hump.[197]
  57. ^ Martin's role in boosting morale during the final year of the airlift was significant. In his memoirs Tunner called him "a godsend" and noted that in addition to performing, Martin was both talent scout and producer, putting together a touring troupe of amateur entertainers culled from the ranks of ICD personnel.[199]

Citations

  1. .
  2. ^ ""駝峰航線"上的年輕勇士(東方主戰場·記憶)——記為中國抗戰犧牲的美國飛行員詹姆斯·布朗--時政--人民網". politics.people.com.cn.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Correll 2009, pp. 68–69
  4. ^ a b Tunner 1955, pp. 19–20.
  5. ^ a b Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 35.
  6. ^ Launis 2000, p. 110.
  7. ^ a b Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 131.
  8. ^ a b c d Launis 2000, p. 111.
  9. ^ Launis 2000, p. 113.
  10. ^ Daugherty 1996, p. 100.
  11. ^ Li, 2003, p. 16 & 19. Hump Air Transport; See "Mao BangChu"
  12. ^ Plating, 2011, p. 38. The Hump: America's Strategy for Keeping China in World War II. Texas A&M University Press
  13. ^ a b Heck 1958, p. 115.
  14. ^ a b Weaver 1947, pp. 497.
  15. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 32.
  16. ^ a b Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 33.
  17. ^ Heck 1958, pp. 114–115.
  18. ^ a b c Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 34.
  19. ^ Carter 1958, p. 54.
  20. ^ Daugherty 1996, p. 101.
  21. ^ Weaver 1947, p. 503.
  22. ^ Daugherty 1996, p. 102.
  23. ^ Carter 1958, pp. 8–9.
  24. ^ Carter 1958, pp. 9–10.
  25. ^ Carter 1958, pp. 10, 13–14.
  26. ^ a b c d DeBerry 2002, p. 49.
  27. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 36.
  28. ^ Heck 1958, p. 139 footnote.
  29. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 47.
  30. ^ a b c d Glines 1991, pp. 102–105.
  31. ^ Okerstrom 2015, pp. 126–127.
  32. ^ Kline 2007
  33. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 18.
  34. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 59.
  35. ^ Carter 1958, pp. 32, 35.
  36. ^ a b Heck 1958, p. 119.
  37. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 169.
  38. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 169 Appendix 2.
  39. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 60.
  40. ^ Heck 1958, p. 116.
  41. ^ Heck 1958, p. 117.
  42. ^ Romanus & Sunderland 1953, p. 200.
  43. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, pp. 35–38.
  44. ^ a b Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 411.
  45. ^ a b Heck 1958, pp. 118–119.
  46. ^ Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 412.
  47. ^ Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 413.
  48. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, pp. 67–68.
  49. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 78.
  50. ^ Weaver 1947, pp. 396–399 and 494.
  51. ^ Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 410.
  52. ^ Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 416.
  53. ^ Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 432.
  54. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 112.
  55. ^ Carter & Mueller 1991, p. 62.
  56. ^ a b Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 433.
  57. ^ Weaver 1946, pp. 17–18.
  58. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 111.
  59. ^ a b Heck 1958, p. 120.
  60. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, p. 58.
  61. ^ Weaver & Rapp 1944, pp. 58–59.
  62. ^ a b Heck 1958, pp. 119–121.
  63. ^ McGowan 2011, p. 63.
  64. ^ Heck 1958, pp. 121, 123.
  65. ^ Heck 1958, pp. 121–122.
  66. ^ Coffey 1982, pp. 291–292.
  67. ^ Birdsall 1973, p. 164.
  68. ^ a b Heck 1958, p. 122.
  69. ^ a b Bowman 1989, p. 107.
  70. ^ Weaver & Bowen 1950, pp. 444–445.
  71. ^ Heck 1958, p. 124.
  72. ^ Heck 1958, p. 123.
  73. ^ Carter 1958, p. 49.
  74. ^ Goldblatt 2011, Ferry Command (See the section's notes).
  75. ^ Heck 1958, pp. 125–127.
  76. ^ a b Weaver & Bowen 1950, pp. 445–448.
  77. ^ Lewis 2005, p. 2005.
  78. ^ Weaver 1946, p. 21.
  79. ^ a b c Heck 1958, pp. 129–130.
  80. ^ a b c Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 467.
  81. ^ Weaver 1946, pp. 55.
  82. ^ Allen 1984, p. 390.
  83. ^ a b Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 468.
  84. ^ Weaver 1946, pp. 55–56.
  85. ^ Weaver 1946, pp. 62–63.
  86. ^ Heck 1958, p. 128.
  87. ^ Heck 1958, p. 130.
  88. ^ Coffey 1982, p. 331.
  89. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 88.
  90. ^ Heflin 1953, p. 182.
  91. ^ "Hastings, a Pictorial Report". Archived from the original on 2011-07-26.
  92. ^ a b c Goldblatt 2011, 1st Ferrying Group
  93. ^ Coffey 1982, p. 330.
  94. ^ a b Hanson 2008, p. 33.
  95. ^ a b c d e Staff & 1945-11-15a.
  96. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 70.
  97. ^ a b c Heck 1958, p. 127.
  98. ^ Heflin 1953, p. 181.
  99. ^ a b Heck 1958, p. 136.
  100. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 64.
  101. ^ a b c d e Heck 1958, p. 143.
  102. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 95.
  103. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 97.
  104. ^ Staff & 1945-04-12, "Trojan Run Takes C-54 Over Hump Twice Daily".
  105. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 110.
  106. ^ Hanson 2008, p. 36.
  107. ^ a b Staff & 1945-01-25, "Hump's Worst Weather Bats Planes About".
  108. ^ Heck 1958, p. 140.
  109. ^ Hanson 2008, p. 31.
  110. ^ Glines 1991, p. 104.
  111. ^ Tunner 1955, pp. 66–68.
  112. ^ Staff & 1945-03-15, "Flying Safety Officers launch Intensified Drive".
  113. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 90.
  114. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 131.
  115. ^ Heck 1958, pp. 144–145.
  116. ^ Heck 1958, p. 145.
  117. ^ Heck 1958, pp. 143–146.
  118. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 116.
  119. ^ a b Hanson 2008, p. 35.
  120. ^ a b Tunner 1955, pp. 132–134.
  121. ^ Fogerty 1953, pp. 62–63 (PDF).
  122. ^ Staff & 1945-11-15a, "Lawrence new CG".
  123. ^ a b Heck 1958, p. 134.
  124. ^ a b Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 457.
  125. ^ Weaver 1946, pp. 19, 21.
  126. ^ Weaver 1946, pp. 20–21.
  127. ^ a b Taylor 1957, p. 62.
  128. ^ Allen 1984, pp. 242–244.
  129. ^ Correll 2009, pp. 68, 70 (map).
  130. ^ Heck 1958, p. 135.
  131. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 83.
  132. ^ Cate 1953, p. 84.
  133. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 74, 76.
  134. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 76–77.
  135. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 77.
  136. ^ Cate 1953, p. 175.
  137. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 130.
  138. ^ Cate 1953, p. 90.
  139. ^ Nalty 1997, p. 342.
  140. ^ Bowen 1953, pp. 215–219.
  141. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 83, 89.
  142. ^ Bowen 1953, p. 224.
  143. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 86, 148, 225.
  144. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 126–130.
  145. ^ Staff & 1945-02-23, "'Sylvester's Circus' Makes Records In Three Theaters".
  146. ^ Cate 1953, pp. 89.
  147. ^ a b c Goldblatt 2010 cites: "Courtesy of Mr. Lee Schnur, 2nd ATS"
  148. ^ Tunner 1955, pp. 117–121.
  149. ^ a b Taylor 1957, p. 50.
  150. ^ a b Bowen 1953, pp. 253–254.
  151. ^ a b Bowen 1953, pp. 254–255.
  152. ^ a b Bowen 1953, p. 256.
  153. ^ Staff & 1945-02-15, Flout Enemy to Evacuate Suichwan.
  154. ^ Heck 1958, p. 149.
  155. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 121.
  156. ^ Sherry 2003, p. 9.
  157. ^ Slim 1956, Chapter IX: The Foundations.
  158. ^ a b Hanson 2008, p. 32.
  159. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 129.
  160. ^ Carter 1958, p. 22.
  161. ^ Gann 1961, p. 263.
  162. ^ Gann 1961, p. 215.
  163. ^ Gann 1961, pp. 214–215.
  164. ^ Birdsall 1973, p. 50.
  165. ^ Gann 1961, pp. 216–217.
  166. ^ Baugher 1999, "Consolidated C-109".
  167. ^ a b c Vinyard 2005, Flying the Hump.
  168. ^ Gann 1961, pp. 263–264.
  169. ^ a b Leeuw 2008.
  170. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 45.
  171. ^ Carter 1958, p. 25.
  172. ^ Okerstrom 2015, p. 133.
  173. ^ Okerstrom 2015, p. 132.
  174. ^ Weaver & Bowen 1950, p. 448.
  175. ^ Carter 1958, pp. 30, 44.
  176. ^ Gann 1961, p. 271.
  177. ^ Goebel 2002.
  178. ^ American Aircraft of World War Two 2006.
  179. ^ Birdsall 1973, p. 143.
  180. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 79.
  181. ^ Heck 1958, pp. 132–133.
  182. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 98.
  183. ^ Staff & 1945-11-15b, "Blackie's Gang Instills Confidence in Air Crews".
  184. ^ a b United States. Army Air Forces. Office of Statistical Control 1945, p. [page needed].
  185. ^ Heck 1958, p. 150.
  186. ^ Heflin 1953, p. 192.
  187. ^ Hanson 2008, p. 65.
  188. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 59.
  189. ^ Jay Taylor, Stilwell's The Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the Struggle for Modern China, pp. 271
  190. ISSN 0362-4331
    . Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  191. ^ Gann 1961, pp. 261, 270.
  192. .
  193. ^ "Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian".
  194. ^ "Lloyd H. Aronson Obituary (2010) the Washington Post". Legacy.com.
  195. ^ "God is My Co Pilot". Charles Scribner's Sons. 1943.
  196. ^ "World War 2 Flying Ace Arthur Chin's Amazing True Story". disciplesofflight.com. 7 October 2015. Retrieved 17 April 2018.
  197. ^ Okerstrom 2015, pp. 133 and 200.
  198. ^ a b "Candidates for ATC Football Team Organize Hindu Eleven". Hump Express. India China Division, Air Transport Command. 16 August 1945. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 19 March 2015.
  199. ^ Tunner 1955, p. 108.
  200. ^ "Gale Directory of Company Histories:Cathay Pacific Airways Limited". answers.com. Retrieved July 6, 2012.
  201. ^ Whiting, Sam (10 February 2022). "David Nelson, San Francisco PR man who pushed through the Maritime National Historical Park, dies at 101". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 8 April 2022.

General references

Websites

Contemporary newspapers

Further reading

  • Slayton, Robert A. (2010). Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift. University of Alabama Press. .

External links

Media related to The Hump at Wikimedia Commons