Hamoodur Rahman Commission
The Hamoodur Rahman Commission (otherwise known as War Enquiry Commission
Constituted to prepare strictly germane report on "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the
The commission's final report was very lengthy and provided an analysis based on extensive interviews and testimonies. Its primary conclusion was very critical of the role of Pakistan's
Originally, there were 12 copies of the report. These were all destroyed; except the one that was handed over to Government who disallowed its publication at the time. In 2000, parts of the commission report were leaked to
The full report was thought to be declassified by the government in 2000, along with other reports concerning the year 1971.
Historical background
Formation of commission
In 1971, East Pakistan seceded from Pakistan and declared independence as Bangladesh. The resulting civil war ended with the signing of a Pakistani surrender after the military intervention of India.[5]
Upon consolidating the
Initially, the commission was known as the War Enquiry Commission but gained notability as "Hamoodur Rehman Commission" across the country.
The commission had consisted of both civilian and military officials that investigated the political and military failures based on the interviews and testimonies provided by the POWs, politicians, activists, military leaders, and journalists for two years.[citation needed] The commission submitted its final report in 1974.[7]
Commission members
- Supreme Court of Pakistan
- Chief Justice Hamoodur Rahman (chairman)
- Senior Justice Anwarul Haq (vice-chairman)
- Senior Justice Tufail Rahman (chief justice of Sindh High Court)
- Two additional members from Baluchistan High Court
- Lieutenant-General (retired) Altaf Qadir was its military adviser.[8]
Interviewees and testimonies (1972–74)
The commission interviewed and stored testimonies in both first and supplementary reports. In 1972, it was reported that around 213 officials were interviewed and testified, including Yahya Khan and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.[9] In 1974, the Commission again resumed its work and interviewed 300 freed POWs and recorded 73 more bureaucrats' testimonies that served on government assignments in East Pakistan.[9]
- Yahya Khan (1972)[9]
- Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (1972)[9]
- Abdul Hamid Khan(1972)
- Gul Hasan(1972)
- A.O. Mitha(1972)
- Nurul Amin (1972)
- Abdul Rahim Khan(1972)
- Leslie Mungavin (1972)
- Tikka Khan (1972)
- Muzaffar Hassan (1972)
- Mitty Masud(1972)
- Syed Mohammad Ahsan(1972)
- Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi(1975)
- Rao Farman Ali (1974)
- Mohammad Shariff (1974)
- Patrick Desmond Callaghan (1974)
- Siddique Salik (1974)
- Mansurul Haq (1974)
Note that the list of interviewees is incomplete.
First report
In July 1972, President
The Commission considered this initial report as "tentative" as it had not been able to interview many
It has been theorized that the first report is so critical of the Pakistan Army's actions in East Pakistan that publication could have weakened the army's influence.[11] The first report also made many insightful recommendations for reorganizing the military physicals, tradition, and their syllabus and training agenda as well as promoting the sense of democratization environment in the political system of the country.[10]
The first report is never published and kept as highly classified documents because of its potentially adverse effects on the military's (at that time) low-institutional morale and fear of a backlash.[10] The government and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto himself maintained that the first report was classified to "save its [the military's] honour".[10]
Supplementary report
In 1974, the Commission reopened its enquiry offering an opportunity to the prisoners of war who
Commission held an informal meeting at Lahore on 3 June 1974 to consider various preliminary matters and then decided to resume proceedings at Abbottabad from 16 July 1974.[citation needed] After the investigation resumed in 1974 the commission interviewed with seventy–three more East Pakistani bureaucrats and high-ranked military personnel.[12][9]
The Commission examined nearly 300 witnesses in total, hundreds of classified documents and
The commission also held that the families of West Pakistani service members in East Pakistan were subjected to inhumane treatment by Bengalis.
The final report, also called the supplementary report, was submitted on 23 October 1974, showed how political, administrative, military and moral failings were responsible for the surrender of Pakistani forces in East Pakistan.[8] It remained classified and its contents were guessed from the revealing of different military officers.[2] The report was organized into Five Chapters and an annexure.
- Chapter One – The Moral Aspect
- Chapter Two – Alleged atrocities by the Pakistan Army
- Chapter Three – Professional Responsibilities of Certain Senior Army Commanders
- Chapter Four – Conclusions
- Chapter Five – Recommendations
Findings
The commission challenged the claims by
Volume I of the supplementary report dealt with the
The Commission found that when the tales of slaughtering of
Both the first and the supplementary report's findings accused the
The report accused the army generals of what it called a "premature surrender" and said the military's continued involvement in running the government
The report accused General Yahya Khan, of being a womanizer and an alcoholic.[3] According to the report "Firm and proper action would not only satisfy the nation's demand for punishment where it is deserved but would also ensure against any recurrence of the kind of shameful conduct displayed during the 1971 war".[17]
Recommendations
Many insightful recommendations were made by the commission as it recommends to hold the
According to the Commission General Mustafa's offensive plan aimed at the capture of the Indian position of Ramgarh in the Rajasthan area (Western Front) was militarily unsound and haphazardly planned, and its execution resulted in severe loss of vehicles and equipment in the desert.[18]
In the supplementary report section in "Higher Direction of War act" of the HRC report, it strongly called for the establishment of
The chairmanship was to be rotated between each inter-services, irrespective of the personal ranks in each service.
In the end, the commission opined in the report that the nation would learn the necessary lessons from these tragic events and that effective and early action will be taken in the light of the conclusions reached.[2]
Aftermath
The supplementary report was submitted by Chief Justice Hamoodur Rahman to Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto on 23 October 1974. Bhutto classified the report because, according to journalist Salil Tripathi, he was concerned that it would demoralize the military and might trigger unrest therein.[12] In 1976, Rahman asked Bhutto what was being done about the report. Bhutto replied that the report was missing; it was either lost, or stolen, and was nowhere to be found.[12]
Upon hearing the fate of the report, Chief Justice Rahman asked the
In the 1990s, the curiosity over the report grew with the
Contents of the report were published by the Dawn and the India Today and rumored to be the first report, in August 2000.[2] However, it was revealed that this was the supplementary report that was presumably published.[2][8][17][21] Soon after the revelation, the India Today willfully suppressed its own publications as if the surrender was its own scandal.[4]
No action was ever taken based on the report, the report was classified and its publication disallowed at the time.
President Pervez Musharraf reportedly commented in October 2000 that the incidents in 1971 were a political as well as a military debacle, and that calls for the military generals to be tried were not fair.[16] Subsequently, Bangladesh requested a copy of the report.[17] In December 2000, 29 years after the inquiry was completed, the War Report was finally declassified in Pakistan by President Musharraf.[3]
Former Pakistan Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa blamed the 1971 Bangladesh war debacle on the country's politicians.[22] Former Pakistan PM and PTI founder Imran Khan urged the nation to read Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report to know who was responsible for East Pakistan debacle.[23]
See also
- Bangladesh-Pakistan relations
- Bangladesh Liberation War
- Cold War (1962–79)
- International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)
References
- ^ a b c d "Hamoodur Rehman Commission Report" (PDF). Dunya News. Retrieved 22 August 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t "Hamoodur Rahman Commission reports". Story of Pakistan. January 2000. Retrieved 14 June 2013.
- ^ a b c Pakistan declassifies 1971 war report, BBC News, 2000-12-31
- ^ ISBN 978-81-7062-133-1.
- ISBN 978-1-4422-4148-0.
- ^ Pakistan Peoples Party
- ISBN 978-1-60127-075-7.
- ^ a b c Behind Pakistan's Defeat, India Today, 2000-08-21
- ^ ISBN 978-0-8223-5038-5.
- ^ ISBN 9780674419773. Retrieved 25 August 2016.
- ISBN 9781851098019.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-300-21818-3.
- ISBN 0300101473.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-415-56566-0. Retrieved 26 August 2016.
- ^ Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report Archived 16 August 2016 at the Wayback Machine, chapter 2 Archived 12 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine, paragraph 33
- ^ a b c d e Local Elections in Pakistan Are First Vote Since 1999 Coup, The New York Times, 2001-01-01
- ^ a b c Bangladesh requests war report, BBC News, 2000-08-30
- ^ ISBN 9781628941678. Retrieved 26 August 2016.
- ^ ISBN 978-1604500202.
- ISBN 9781136517594. Retrieved 26 August 2016.
- ^ Gen Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan – 4, Dawn, 2000-09-17
- ^ "Former Pakistan Army chief Javed Bajwa blames politicians for 1971 war debacle". The Economic Times. 30 November 2022. Archived from the original on 6 December 2022.
- ^ Shehzad, Rizwan (1 June 2024). "PTI demands release of report on '71 debacle". The Express Tribune. Retrieved 2 June 2024.